Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,309 posts)
15. Most federal judges already know how crimes are committed across jurisdictions. She doesn't.
Wed Aug 9, 2023, 01:54 PM
Aug 2023

She probably doesn't know how evidence is gathered to begin with. She'll just have to take SC Smith's word on that until he submits some more on discovery. That will be a test.

Because he could be holding evidence of crimes to the north to see further how she, Trump, and his FL counsel behave. She already denied additional evidence brought by his team (two of the best espionage trial lawyers in the country). If she rejects it he can file another indictment on other aspects of this national security case in NJ and/or DC, depending on who he's indicting -- this time, probably Trump and co-conspirators.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Didn't This Document Case Get It's Start In D.C.?...... global1 Aug 2023 #1
Yes, that's correct Effete Snob Aug 2023 #6
we know Trump was entertaining his guests agingdem Aug 2023 #9
I'm a little curious about ex trump lawyer Evan Corcoran mentioning "out of state grand jury" mitch96 Aug 2023 #2
I think one of the main differences is that Otto_Harper Aug 2023 #3
Didn't know about the lawyer comment but I was about to post the same underpants Aug 2023 #5
No. Myrtle is cooking hot tinymontgomery Aug 2023 #14
I think Cannon is looking for a justification to dismiss the charges. Nt Fiendish Thingy Aug 2023 #4
She may have found justification to dismiss her instead. Escurumbele Aug 2023 #8
Or get herself replaced. flying_wahini Aug 2023 #11
She's probably afraid for her own safety if she follows the law. rubbersole Aug 2023 #20
She hinted that tfgs lawyers could file a motion to dismiss getagrip_already Aug 2023 #13
Do it, Jack, just do it. The time has come. republianmushroom Aug 2023 #7
More than a documents case, this is a breach of national security case dlk Aug 2023 #10
It's much simpler to sell bothsiderism about a "documents" case..... jaxexpat Aug 2023 #17
Well-said dlk Aug 2023 #23
Can see why a judge in Florida might question whether findings in DC are pertinent in Florida. Silent Type Aug 2023 #12
Most federal judges already know how crimes are committed across jurisdictions. She doesn't. ancianita Aug 2023 #15
She seems too stupid to be handling this. EndlessWire Aug 2023 #26
The "classified documents" didn't self-generate as "classified documents" in FL BumRushDaShow Aug 2023 #16
I wonder if Loose Cannon really wants out of having to try this Trump case Hekate Aug 2023 #18
My suspicion: she's trying to do FOOL* a favor...... lastlib Aug 2023 #21
Trump stole them in DC. boston bean Aug 2023 #19
The documents were stored/seized there. lastlib Aug 2023 #22
The crime occured as soon as his plane left D.C, airspace 3825-87867 Aug 2023 #24
Judge Cannon, TFG's own next-in-line to his human centipede. ffr Aug 2023 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ex-US attorney: Jack Smit...»Reply #15