Elements:
1. Valid order;
2. Actual notice of the order;
3. Ability to comply; and
4. Wilful non-compliance.
Possible punishment can (but not mandatory) included confinement.
See: The classic criminal contempt is one where the act of contempt has been completed, punishment is imposed to vindicate the authority of the court, and a person cannot by subsequent action purge himself of such contempt. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 441443 (1911); Ex parte Grossman, 267 U.S. 87 (1925). See also Bessette v. W.B. Conkey Co., 194 U.S. 324, 327328 (1904).
Punishment:
In such cases, the offending person or corporation may be punished by both fine and imprisonment. In those cases where by accused is a natural person, however, the term of imprisonment shall not exceed six months, and the amount of any fine paid to the United States shall not exceed $1,000. Unlike contemnors charged under § 401, some categories of contemnors charged under § 402 are statutorily entitled to a jury trial before any punishment can be imposed.
https://www.bafirm.com/publication/federal-contempt-of-court/#:~:text=In%20such%20cases%2C%20the%20offending,States%20shall%20not%20exceed%20%241%2C000.
IMO, this judge has stones and will not hesitate of move on any contempt citation brought by the prosecutors. The order of date? She is not playing or giving the defendant a chance to fuck around and claim "First Amendment" rights as an excuse. The prosecution labels the material and her order applies. PERIOD.
Also IMO, she imposed the exact order the government was seeking because the defendant said basically he did not give a shit what the court said, ordered or ruled.