Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: now texas is arguing a fetus isnt a baby and doesnt have rights [View all]IcyPeas
(25,544 posts)32. Get this: (from the linked article in the OP)....
(Bolding mine)
However, she also urged Albright to allow the argument that TDCJ officials violated the FMLA [family medical leave act] provision that allows employees to leave to care for their sons or daughters under the age of 18. In that claim, fetal personhood, or the idea of a fetus being legally considered a person, is front and center.
Issa and her husband say in court filings that she was seeking to leave work because her unborn child was suffering from a serious health condition, including a lack of oxygen and difficulty breathing during labor.
Issas unborn child was past viability and its heartbeat had previously been detected, the couples filing states. This overwhelmingly supports finding the unborn child to be a son or daughter given the significance the State of Texas has attached to such benchmarks.
Texas argued that the claim is invalid because Issa was only seeking leave to care for herself, not a child. And, they note, she was able to take leave after the stillbirth.
Issa and her husband say in court filings that she was seeking to leave work because her unborn child was suffering from a serious health condition, including a lack of oxygen and difficulty breathing during labor.
Issas unborn child was past viability and its heartbeat had previously been detected, the couples filing states. This overwhelmingly supports finding the unborn child to be a son or daughter given the significance the State of Texas has attached to such benchmarks.
Texas argued that the claim is invalid because Issa was only seeking leave to care for herself, not a child. And, they note, she was able to take leave after the stillbirth.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
now texas is arguing a fetus isnt a baby and doesnt have rights [View all]
moonshinegnomie
Aug 2023
OP
The baby had passed the fetal stage, thus of no interest to the state. Conservative states do not do
LiberalArkie
Aug 2023
#25
Isn't it ironic that now TX is scrambling to change the meaning of when a fetus is a person and vice
SWBTATTReg
Aug 2023
#4
" their definition of human life shifts to cause maximum suffering to women."
Maru Kitteh
Aug 2023
#47
Do the terms "viable outside the womb" and "detectible heartbeat" come to mind?
Scottie Mom
Aug 2023
#12
If they had their way abortion would be forbidden to the ubermensch and mandatory for everyone else.
Marcuse
Aug 2023
#14
Texas Republicans have gone full Taliban faster than I thought they would. All that matters in this
Lonestarblue
Aug 2023
#20
This case is going to attract national attention - rightly so. Have a feeling some heavyweight
NoMoreRepugs
Aug 2023
#21
It's not about the definition of life, it's about controlling women. Their hypocrisy and preference
KPN
Aug 2023
#24
It is and always was about keeping women in their place. I bet they're already blaming her...
Hekate
Aug 2023
#28