Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mercuryblues

(16,471 posts)
22. dear alice
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 11:17 AM
Nov 2012

It is hard for me to believe that a woman has no idea that being able to have the basic right to make medical decisions regarding their own bodies is also an economic choice. The republicans have made it very clear that they also want to ban birth control methods. I for one am glad that I did not have to produce a child everytime I had sex with my husband. After 20 years of marriage, I would be on at least my 20th kid, I kid you not. How egotistical of me to think 20 kids are more than we can handle financially. How positively fucking selfish of me to think that just because a womans body can produce a baby every 9 months [and 6 weeks] she should.

I can not imagine the economic impact it would have on the country when women are forced to be nothing more than baby making machines. To give you a clue: My mother had 3 daughters, if you combine our fertile years we would have produced at least 50 babies. Now out of those 50 babies, let's just say for arguements sake 25 of them were female. Those 25 females produced 20 children each. That equals 500. 250 of those are female and they have 20 kids.... How many generations would it take before farmland was wiped out? people do have to live somewhere. How would the corporations be able to handle the disposal of just the human waste? How long do you think it would be before epidemics of cholera, flu, and other diseases were the norm? Just for shits and giggles why don't you compare the economic wealth of country that have access to contraceptive measures to those who don't.


So Alice, in closing I would like to add; our choice did not set women back tremendously. It empowers us to participate in our country as full citizens. It empowers OUR country by not overproducing. It is your attitude that sets women back, back to they days when women were not allowed to own property, sign a legal contract, and VOTE.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Another Rush fan. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #1
what is really a hoot is when us women can vote with a voice that it is our body, and still be votin seabeyond Nov 2012 #2
The republicans know selfishness very well liberal N proud Nov 2012 #3
I read that this morning bigwillq Nov 2012 #4
My husband started yelling from the other room when he read it this morning! CTyankee Nov 2012 #7
Well for one thing she's a full-bred 'moran' malaise Nov 2012 #5
One small mistake here...... Uben Nov 2012 #6
Their self centered women and men caused their loss. RegieRocker Nov 2012 #8
Isn't she the one in the minority? democrat in Tallahassee Nov 2012 #9
Maybe if the republicans hadn't gone out of their way to shove medical devices Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #10
how is it selfish to want my 3 girls to have able to have choices in their lives? ejpoeta Nov 2012 #11
Now let's see if I, a woman, can possibly protect our future Nov 2012 #12
My God how do you people live with that MuseRider Nov 2012 #13
Well, put yourself in the place of this woman and other RW idiots! They have to live in CTyankee Nov 2012 #16
I would wager that the women who voted for Obama were equally concerned LeftinOH Nov 2012 #14
Thankfully, most women in CT are smarter then that. Jennicut Nov 2012 #15
It always makes me laugh when people from CT calico1 Nov 2012 #17
I am SO tempted to say "Ya know, it sounds like you'd feel more at home in Mississippi, doncha CTyankee Nov 2012 #18
Exactly. calico1 Nov 2012 #21
Fuck that. HeeBGBz Nov 2012 #30
My apologies to the good people of MS! I won't suggest any red state to them! CTyankee Nov 2012 #33
I'm selfish for wanting autonomy over my body? gollygee Nov 2012 #19
I found a LTTE written by her great-great grandmother. Ikonoklast Nov 2012 #20
dear alice mercuryblues Nov 2012 #22
Boy, I could SO use some of your post in my response to this LTTE! CTyankee Nov 2012 #24
the mercuryblues Nov 2012 #27
It's easy to know where to begin: first, buy a birdcage... JHB Nov 2012 #23
I prefer Obama's economic plan to Romney's by a long shot gollygee Nov 2012 #25
Guess what Alice? Democratic women can multitask. We can juggle MANY issues at once riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #26
Which paper was this? The NH Register? n/t calico1 Nov 2012 #28
Yes, it was the RAGister! CTyankee Nov 2012 #34
I don't read it that often because I am in Ledyard so calico1 Nov 2012 #37
We read the Courant on Sundays. It is never this obnoxious and I think it endorsed Obama. CTyankee Nov 2012 #38
That is the mind set Raffi Ella Nov 2012 #29
Hey shitbag Republican - NO you will NOT tell me what to do with my body. Avalux Nov 2012 #31
I truly didn't get what she was referring to when she talked about "the future of the country." CTyankee Nov 2012 #35
She's clearly a pro-lifer, so maybe, but..... Avalux Nov 2012 #36
First, did this nitwit ask every single woman WHY they voted for Obama? joeybee12 Nov 2012 #32
Romney got 56% of the white woman vote Kaleva Nov 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Selfish women backe...»Reply #22