Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R for exposure Blue Owl Oct 2023 #1
Trump committing treason is like a Dog Bites Man story. edhopper Oct 2023 #2
Which is funny, because I believe the story about Joe's dog is playing higher in the paper Walleye Oct 2023 #4
could only be beat by story of Hunter Biden's dog housecat Oct 2023 #26
😆 Walleye Oct 2023 #32
We shouldn't be squeamish, in ads, about accusing trump of outright espionage Walleye Oct 2023 #3
The Times, especially Maggie Haberman, have been all over Trump about Mar-A-Lago. ificandream Oct 2023 #5
Haberman is the worst, working as a damage control PR person for Trump Bev54 Oct 2023 #10
+1. Protecting the Trumps is a Haberman family tradition dalton99a Oct 2023 #29
Far from it ificandream Oct 2023 #56
You mean that book that she saved many "newsworthy" stories to make a buck on Bev54 Oct 2023 #61
That is the furthest thing from the truth GuppyGal Oct 2023 #65
She's been all over his orange ass for years yet he still keeps calling her GuppyGal Oct 2023 #66
The MSM is in the tank for Republicans. That's why they are all normalizing Trump's criminal and RAB910 Oct 2023 #6
Sure would seem that way... Evolve Dammit Oct 2023 #34
People noticed MN2theMax Oct 2023 #7
Is it possible to shame them? wryter2000 Oct 2023 #20
they changed their headline this am. spun the jobs numbers as a bad thing. mopinko Oct 2023 #24
The NY times has been like that for years, I do not understand how people don't know that Bev54 Oct 2023 #8
I dropped my subscription to the NYT back in 2015 LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2023 #9
When it comes to trump, stuff like that is not really news. It's typical. Besides, I can't imagine Silent Type Oct 2023 #11
sorry. but that completely misses the point stopdiggin Oct 2023 #16
By now people know whether they will support trump. This story won't move the needle, even if Silent Type Oct 2023 #19
It should still make top news and media shoukd ask every republican about it JI7 Oct 2023 #21
There are still independents and others who may be waiting to see what happens with Turmp. Lonestarblue Oct 2023 #23
Honestly, this story -- about number of warheads on a sub, etc -- is not as damning as stolen boxes Silent Type Oct 2023 #25
Imagine the MSM outrage if Obama had done this. rubbersole Oct 2023 #27
No doubt. I still prefer to report on things that are really damning regarding trump. Silent Type Oct 2023 #31
Nuke secrets are as serious as it gets. rubbersole Oct 2023 #36
Then, let's concentrate on Russian ties, not realtively minor stuff. Silent Type Oct 2023 #39
It wasn't just warhead counts Farmer-Rick Oct 2023 #44
Google- "How close can usa nuclear subs get to ships without being detected." You'll find the answer Silent Type Oct 2023 #45
Will you????? Farmer-Rick Oct 2023 #47
LOL. But, I found answers going back years. Silent Type Oct 2023 #48
Yeah, if you read it on the Internet Farmer-Rick Oct 2023 #49
Nowadays, sub capabilities are not a big secret, believe it or not. Silent Type Oct 2023 #50
Does this look like a secret to you? Silent Type Oct 2023 #54
This is not what Trump gave away Farmer-Rick Oct 2023 #58
Nuclear sub positions are probably obsolete within a few days, assuming Silent Type Oct 2023 #59
It depends Farmer-Rick Oct 2023 #69
Except that didn't happen, at least that we know of. Silent Type Oct 2023 #70
At least that we know of..... Farmer-Rick Oct 2023 #71
Said it on purpose. Silent Type Oct 2023 #72
Don't you dare! EndlessWire Oct 2023 #53
I'm not minimizing anything, other than this submarine junk that is not why most of us despise trump Silent Type Oct 2023 #55
Same with the app and browser versions Rachel M at 6 pm Oct 2023 #12
The ONLY "liberal media" usonian Oct 2023 #13
I'm beginning to think the media is trying to commit suicide. BComplex Oct 2023 #14
THIS! 617Blue Oct 2023 #15
Only an a-hole would share sensitive military secrets about our nuclear subs iluvtennis Oct 2023 #17
Here is today's NYT front page. mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2023 #18
pathetic. Truly Evolve Dammit Oct 2023 #35
The old Grey Lady excuse. Or they are tilting the scales for Trump like normal LymphocyteLover Oct 2023 #43
The problem is the same as in 2015 RANDYWILDMAN Oct 2023 #22
more NYT "yellowcake" fuckery - unforgivable pile of shit bringthePaine Oct 2023 #28
The NYT has never been a friend of democracy or Democrats. dalton99a Oct 2023 #30
Ooh! I love Oscar Heyman! Simeon Salus Oct 2023 #33
I spend early mornings as a "robin" BumRushDaShow Oct 2023 #37
The grey lady has been corrupt for a long time Warpy Oct 2023 #38
I have never confused the NY Times with being a liberal oriented news source. NNadir Oct 2023 #40
Shame on them. NoMoreRepugs Oct 2023 #41
They are totally biased against Dems and have been for decades now! IT SUCKS!!! LymphocyteLover Oct 2023 #42
I read the NYT today, which was where I found out about the nuclear sub story. ramen Oct 2023 #46
Perhaps it isn't . . . markpkessinger Oct 2023 #52
Meanwhile, on their website . . . markpkessinger Oct 2023 #51
How Is This RobinA Oct 2023 #57
But her GD emails.. I hate the NYT. Cha Oct 2023 #60
The fascist NYT loves dear leader. onecaliberal Oct 2023 #62
A13?? Just buried. No fold about it. nilram Oct 2023 #63
uh yup... bluboid Oct 2023 #64
Saturday's NYT front page: mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2023 #67
Trumps bad behavior has become unsurprising. D23MIURG23 Oct 2023 #68
Remarkable that this story is buried on Page A13 in today's New York Times. LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2023 #73
It lost its "liberal" aura, which it really wasn't anyway, when Judy Miller pushed the false WMD JohnSJ Oct 2023 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT burying a story about...»Reply #48