General Discussion

TrueBlueBlackQueen

(32 posts)

45. Wow. You are even trying to make his post yours.

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #34)

Sun Oct 22, 2023, 05:00 PM

Oct 2023

He said what he said, dral with that. We say TFG incites violence with words, shall we be offended when someone says Tlaib did with her words?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rashida Tlaib Under Fire After Detroit Synagogue Leader's Slaying [View all] question everything Oct 2023 OP

Newsweek is just the 21st Century version of National Enquirer. walkingman Oct 2023 #1

+1 demmiblue Oct 2023 #18

So you're upset because they reported a story that's true? brooklynite Oct 2023 #41

They could have chosen to ignore trolls like Loomer (nt) muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #43

I'm not upset at all. Just stating a fact. ☮ walkingman Oct 2023 #48

Words have consequences TheProle Oct 2023 #2

Are you saying Woll was killed because she was a friend of Tlaib? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #8

I'm saying TheProle Oct 2023 #23

So who are you blaming for the death of Tlaib's friend? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #25

Ah, I see the game TheProle Oct 2023 #27

So you're saying Laura Loomer is right, and the Democrat is to blame. muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #28

Why do you keep asking if he's saying something? TrueBlueBlackQueen Oct 2023 #32

Honestly? The Prole is blaming "words", and the only words this seems to be about muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #34

Wow. You are even trying to make his post yours. TrueBlueBlackQueen Oct 2023 #45

She did not incite violence. TFG does. muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #47

Inciting violence is a chargeable offense. TrueBlueBlackQueen Oct 2023 #56

We all know Trump got away with chargeable offences because he was president muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #57

Are you expecting me to argue that SOB's case? No. Never. TrueBlueBlackQueen Oct 2023 #60

No, I'm expecting you to realise that "had either done this they would have been charged" muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #61

You're not being a serious person. TheProle Oct 2023 #36

I'm being far more serious than saying the consequences of a Democrat's words muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #38

Your techniques are transparent. TheProle Oct 2023 #39

Oh, bollocks. The OP is about far right-wingers making a specific accusation muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #42

Okie dokie TheProle Oct 2023 #52

You said "When an official spreads misinformation and demonizes one side ... muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #59

thank you for having the indefatigability to stand up and effectively push back against a fusillade of sophistry Celerity Oct 2023 #67

Post removed Post removed Oct 2023 #26

Fact? Wow, that's a crappy use of the word "fact". muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #29

That's some pretty strange word twisting right there. tritsofme Oct 2023 #33

Explain. You said "in fact", when the OP is about far-right people saying the murder muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #35

I'm not interested in playing semantics games with you. tritsofme Oct 2023 #40

Again, what do you think I twisted? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #44

Semantic game number 1: "if in fact" has a far different meaning from 'In fact" Beastly Boy Oct 2023 #46

No. "If" does not mean "not". So it's not "the opposite". muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #49

Ummm... qite the opposite. Not the opposite. Beastly Boy Oct 2023 #53

In British English, "quite the opposite" is an emphatic form of "the opposite" muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #58

Semantics game Number 2 Beastly Boy Oct 2023 #63

So you're avoiding the point, which is you were pretending "quite the opposite"is not muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #65

No, that was your point, which was irrelevant. Beastly Boy Oct 2023 #66

Taking the side of terrorists after an attack will do that getagrip_already Oct 2023 #3

Straight up anti semitism Mz Pip Oct 2023 #4

co-sponsor of the Rohingya Genocide Determination Act of 2020 muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #9

Good Mz Pip Oct 2023 #17

I haven't heard that Tlaib took down her post (which she should) gulliver Oct 2023 #5

That's just how it goes MichMan Oct 2023 #6

Agree gulliver Oct 2023 #7

She needs to learn to stop the loose-cannon blasts before getting the facts. IIRC correctly... brush Oct 2023 #11

Yes.. TY! Oh she did apologize for that? Cha Oct 2023 #20

Yes, Tlaib Should Apologize for her Post "Blaming Cha Oct 2023 #16

This is irresponsible (and so was her tweet). demmiblue Oct 2023 #10

No one claims that there is a connection. But she was a constituent and some words of condemnation are in order question everything Oct 2023 #13

Oh, please. demmiblue Oct 2023 #15

I don't know about you but I hope that my congressman will show more compassion question everything Oct 2023 #21

Did you read her statement above? Big Blue Marble Oct 2023 #31

What do you mean, "some words of condemnations are in order" muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #19

Yes, people say there is a connection. But there is no proof. I posted it because I thought it is important question everything Oct 2023 #22

So why did you say no one claims there is a connection? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #24

Yes, and Tlaib was WRONG about her damning statement "Israel Bombed Cha Oct 2023 #30

REC.. TY.. So she Should.. As has been stated.. Cha Oct 2023 #12

I am confused about what the "consequences", and to whom, are you talking about? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #14

Check IT OUT, Tlaib.. FUCKING HAMAS LIED.. Shock. Cha Oct 2023 #37

Yep. Multiple analyses came to the same conclusion dalton99a Oct 2023 #50

Good to know.. TY. Cha Oct 2023 #51

****NEWSWEEK IS RUN BY A RIGHT-WING OPERATIVE/GOON ****** TomDaisy Oct 2023 #54

Speaking of getting facts straight, I wish that news articles wnylib Oct 2023 #55

This is madness NotVeryImportant Oct 2023 #62

And it is dangerous as it probably has already led to threats to her life, N/T Big Blue Marble Oct 2023 #64