Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rashida Tlaib Under Fire After Detroit Synagogue Leader's Slaying [View all]Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)63. Semantics game Number 2
If in fact you were playing semantics games, I would have to establish the fact of you playing semantics games before I can accuse you of playing them. However, quite the opposite is the case: the fact of you playing semantics games had been established with numerous examples in this thread, so I am indeed accusing you of playing semantics games.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rashida Tlaib Under Fire After Detroit Synagogue Leader's Slaying [View all]
question everything
Oct 2023
OP
So you're saying Laura Loomer is right, and the Democrat is to blame.
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#28
Honestly? The Prole is blaming "words", and the only words this seems to be about
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#34
We all know Trump got away with chargeable offences because he was president
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#57
No, I'm expecting you to realise that "had either done this they would have been charged"
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#61
I'm being far more serious than saying the consequences of a Democrat's words
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#38
Oh, bollocks. The OP is about far right-wingers making a specific accusation
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#42
You said "When an official spreads misinformation and demonizes one side ...
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#59
thank you for having the indefatigability to stand up and effectively push back against a fusillade of sophistry
Celerity
Oct 2023
#67
Explain. You said "in fact", when the OP is about far-right people saying the murder
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#35
Semantic game number 1: "if in fact" has a far different meaning from 'In fact"
Beastly Boy
Oct 2023
#46
In British English, "quite the opposite" is an emphatic form of "the opposite"
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#58
So you're avoiding the point, which is you were pretending "quite the opposite"is not
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#65
She needs to learn to stop the loose-cannon blasts before getting the facts. IIRC correctly...
brush
Oct 2023
#11
No one claims that there is a connection. But she was a constituent and some words of condemnation are in order
question everything
Oct 2023
#13
I don't know about you but I hope that my congressman will show more compassion
question everything
Oct 2023
#21
Yes, people say there is a connection. But there is no proof. I posted it because I thought it is important
question everything
Oct 2023
#22
I am confused about what the "consequences", and to whom, are you talking about?
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2023
#14
And it is dangerous as it probably has already led to threats to her life, N/T
Big Blue Marble
Oct 2023
#64