Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The New York Times walks back flawed Gaza hospital coverage, but other media outlets remain silent [View all]
https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/24/media/gaza-hospital-coverage-walk-back/index.htmlThe New York Times walks back flawed Gaza hospital coverage, but other media outlets remain silent
Analysis by Oliver Darcy
5 minute read
Published 2:02 PM EDT, Tue October 24, 2023
Editors Note: A version of this article first appeared in the Reliable Sources newsletter. Sign up for the daily digest chronicling the evolving media landscape here.
CNN Most news organizations seem eager to sweep last weeks negligent coverage of the Gaza hospital explosion under the rug, moving on from the low moment covering the Israel-Hamas war without admitting any mistakes.
While The New York Times and BBC both of which faced enormous scrutiny for their coverage of the blast have in recent days issued mea culpas, the rest of the press has remained mum, declining to explain to their audiences how they initially got an important story of such great magnitude so wrong.
On Monday, I contacted the major news organizations that amplified Hamas claims, which immediately assigned blame to Israel for the blast that it said had left hundreds dead. Those organizations included CNN, the Associated Press, Reuters, Al Jazeera, and The Wall Street Journal.
Did these outlets stand by their initial reporting? Was there any regret repeating claims from the terrorist group? Since the explosion, one week ago Tuesday, Israel and the U.S. have assessed that the rocket originated in Gaza, not Israel. Additional analysis from independent forensic experts, including those contacted by CNN, have indicated that the available evidence from the blast was inconsistent with the damage one would expect to see from an Israeli strike.
[...]
Analysis by Oliver Darcy
5 minute read
Published 2:02 PM EDT, Tue October 24, 2023
Editors Note: A version of this article first appeared in the Reliable Sources newsletter. Sign up for the daily digest chronicling the evolving media landscape here.
CNN Most news organizations seem eager to sweep last weeks negligent coverage of the Gaza hospital explosion under the rug, moving on from the low moment covering the Israel-Hamas war without admitting any mistakes.
While The New York Times and BBC both of which faced enormous scrutiny for their coverage of the blast have in recent days issued mea culpas, the rest of the press has remained mum, declining to explain to their audiences how they initially got an important story of such great magnitude so wrong.
On Monday, I contacted the major news organizations that amplified Hamas claims, which immediately assigned blame to Israel for the blast that it said had left hundreds dead. Those organizations included CNN, the Associated Press, Reuters, Al Jazeera, and The Wall Street Journal.
Did these outlets stand by their initial reporting? Was there any regret repeating claims from the terrorist group? Since the explosion, one week ago Tuesday, Israel and the U.S. have assessed that the rocket originated in Gaza, not Israel. Additional analysis from independent forensic experts, including those contacted by CNN, have indicated that the available evidence from the blast was inconsistent with the damage one would expect to see from an Israeli strike.
[...]
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The New York Times walks back flawed Gaza hospital coverage, but other media outlets remain silent [View all]
sl8
Oct 2023
OP
The scientist from Earshot didn't "address that", so basically it is your theory.
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#78
There's a transcript. No scientist came forward on NPR and said that "there were problems with both scenarios".
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#76
There's lots of nonsense coming out of reddit and twitter. There's a transcript of the NPR report.
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#61
Here ya go! This is what the expert from Earshot said according to the transcript you posted.
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#77
At this point anyone claiming that Israel is behind the hospital explosion...
BlueCheeseAgain
Oct 2023
#11
You mean the sound recording from the videos that all showed it coming from Gaza
EX500rider
Oct 2023
#47
The only groups firing rockets from within Gaza are terrorist groups, Hamas, IJ, etc
EX500rider
Oct 2023
#57
I think you should consider the evident biases in the sources you cite.
BlueCheeseAgain
Oct 2023
#16
I've already fucking looked into the doppler shift and the fact that the shit missile was tumbling throws it off.
SoFlaBro
Oct 2023
#55
Tumbling is relevant due to the direction of the acoustics of the rocket nozzle.
SoFlaBro
Oct 2023
#66
Better to apologize very late for being STUPIDLY wrong and taking the word of TERRORISTS first
Maru Kitteh
Oct 2023
#15
Where did you read about the independent video documenting purported claims that
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#70
If Israel meant to hit that hospital...then they would of HIT IT. End of fucking story.
GuppyGal
Oct 2023
#34