Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Johnson: "We had to blur some of the faces who participted in Jan6 b/c we don't...want them to be charged by DOJ....... [View all]keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)111. "some" --- Thousands of hours of video. It must have taken many man hours and expense to blur "some".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Johnson: "We had to blur some of the faces who participted in Jan6 b/c we don't...want them to be charged by DOJ....... [View all]
riversedge
Dec 2023
OP
@speakerJohnson ASSumes that the DOJ does not have access to all the firms??
riversedge
Dec 2023
#11
Only makes sense if Johnson is grandstanding for magat base. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#39
Amazingly, even after this bit of time, nobody on the FReaky site is posting about it. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#82
It Is Clearly Playing To An Audience That Is Not As On Top of Things
The Roux Comes First
Dec 2023
#108
I hope somebody has the unblurred original video clips so their faces can be out there for all to see.
calimary
Dec 2023
#122
just think if you or I took action to try to prevent the FBI from identifying these criminials
Skittles
Dec 2023
#113
It becomes more apparent every day why this fuckwad was chosen to be speaker. Shameless twat.
EarnestPutz
Dec 2023
#14
The actual Speaker of the House is saying let the criminal faces be blurred so the DOJ can't ID them.
brush
Dec 2023
#17
Or, said another way, "we need to protect our criminal voters from justice".
OAITW r.2.0
Dec 2023
#29
The doj should have all the tapes so fuck that ass. If the dog doesn't then fuck them for not doing their job.
Autumn
Dec 2023
#40
In other words, they'll blur the faces of those who can implicate members of Congress.
tinrobot
Dec 2023
#47
The man second in line to the Presidency is actively working to overthrow the US Government
Hekate
Dec 2023
#51
It's all pandering to the base. "I'll protect you." DOJ and internet sleuths have all the footage already, duh.
NoMoreRepugs
Dec 2023
#57
The DOJ can subpoena evidence one would think? That said it was just a peaceful protest
mzmolly
Dec 2023
#59
It will be like a documentary on the Holocaust that leaves out concentration camps
Ohioboy
Dec 2023
#66
I thought the point of releasing the video was so people could identify all the undercover FBI agents in the crowd. -nt
CrispyQ
Dec 2023
#78
"some" --- Thousands of hours of video. It must have taken many man hours and expense to blur "some".
keithbvadu2
Dec 2023
#111
I take this to mean there is some subset or sub plot that's not discovered yet
bucolic_frolic
Dec 2023
#114
Any appropriations bills passed? Any progress on Israel/Ukraine funding?
Midnight Writer
Dec 2023
#116