Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does the Navajo Nation have a legitimate argument against sending human remains to the Moon? [View all]Haggard Celine
(17,821 posts)1. What is the point?
Why would anybody want to do that?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
176 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does the Navajo Nation have a legitimate argument against sending human remains to the Moon? [View all]
Towlie
Jan 2024
OP
Families arranged to have their cremains placed up there. Navajo say the moon is sacred, so can't have cremains there.
LeftInTX
Jan 2024
#6
"Customers paid prices starting at $12,995, according to the company's website"
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2024
#87
"And that is a lot of fuel used and pollution put into our atmosphere for taking them to the moon."
EX500rider
Jan 2024
#72
They have a right to an opinion, but the religious argument carries zero weight with me
petronius
Jan 2024
#11
Please explain, "Have we entered white Jesus riding in on his V8 Hemi powered dinosaur with an AR-15 blasting
PufPuf23
Jan 2024
#168
Why is stagnation, a closed sky, and a species death sentence for no reason a good thing?
TheKentuckian
Jan 2024
#135
OK...Throwing our trash and unwanted rich white people remains all over earth is a better mental masturbation.
LeftInTX
Jan 2024
#23
The existence of a capsule containing cremated remains, rather than the ones with recordings, or even cryptocurrency
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2024
#59
You don't appear to be addressing any "argument" (and the thread is whether the argument is "legitimate")
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2024
#68
No, we don't have to take their ethical views about spirituality into consideration...
brooklynite
Jan 2024
#129
If we stop doing things because some culture/religion is offended, we'd never be able to do anything ever again.
Angleae
Jan 2024
#30
Polluting the earth with the spent rocket fuel for a stupid clebration for the rich is wrong.
Wonder Why
Jan 2024
#36
Private companies making use of something does not mean it is "privatized"
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2024
#92
How would you view it if someone went to the moon and tore up the flag placed by Apollo 11?
XorXor
Jan 2024
#122
I have no objections, the lifeless rock that is the moon is a much better place then our biosphere
EX500rider
Jan 2024
#128
At this point, nobody. But anyone who's able seems to have the right to send craft up there
Crunchy Frog
Jan 2024
#113
Putting your remains on the moon is another stupid, creepy thing for people who have more money than
Scrivener7
Jan 2024
#106
It's apparently $12,000. There are NFL season tickets that cost more than that.
Crunchy Frog
Jan 2024
#115
If you think the inequitable nature of the distribution of wealth in our country is random, and it doesn't
Scrivener7
Jan 2024
#139
Here's one from For All Mankind. Much more serious of a show then Space Force.
DetroitLegalBeagle
Jan 2024
#109
Fascinating how quickly this diverged from a discussion of spiritual beliefs.
brooklynite
Jan 2024
#133
Navajo Nation should just claim those buried there will lose their souls. Or something like that.
LiberalFighter
Jan 2024
#150
They closed their reservation during October's solar eclipse. Said it was a scared event.
LeftInTX
Jan 2024
#165
I don't think that their religion should dictate policies involving the moon.
Chainfire
Jan 2024
#176