Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Largest presidential grift in history': House Dem drops the hammer on Trump and Kushner [View all]Attilatheblond
(8,890 posts)22. MSM is part of corporate America & also relies on corporations buying ads
Those corporations probably do not want Biden/DEMS to win because the tax cuts they got under Trump/GOP will go bye bye and the most profitable corporations would have to pay a fair share under DEM legislative/executive power.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Largest presidential grift in history': House Dem drops the hammer on Trump and Kushner [View all]
Tom of Temecula
Jan 2024
OP
MSM is part of corporate America & also relies on corporations buying ads
Attilatheblond
Jan 2024
#22
The capitalist system is an evil thing-can't people see in this example how it does not work for the people?
Stargazer99
Jan 2024
#48
her emails and Benghazi. Whitewater and CONSENSUAL sex. Orange Julius and family is SOOO much more egregious.
Evolve Dammit
Jan 2024
#41
Although that may not have been "illegal" but rather "impeachable" ...
Justice matters.
Jan 2024
#31
Wake me when something is done either to punish it or to prevent it in the future.
Scrivener7
Jan 2024
#12
Of course we will all do all we can to keep him out of power, but that is not the issue here.
Scrivener7
Jan 2024
#20
Yup. And if we think it's a slam dunk that the SC WON'T rule that a President can
Scrivener7
Jan 2024
#37
u arnt hearing about him scamming the secret service everytime they stay at one of his properties .
AllaN01Bear
Jan 2024
#21