Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Silver Gaia

(5,365 posts)
5. So, does this concept then filter down to counties and cities?
Tue Jan 30, 2024, 08:54 AM
Jan 2024

This seems wholly untenable. If it filtered down to the local level, I could see even MAGAs being against it. What happens when you're a beer drinking MAGA living in a dry county in the South who's used to visiting the county-line bar on Saturday night, but now you can't because of this crap? Hmmm ..

The end result, over time, would have to be migration. The people who disagree with the restrictions would tend to eventually resettle in areas more amenable to them. We would become a concoction of small city-states or countries, no longer a collection of united states. In the meantime, however, it would be chaos trying to maintain all that surveillance. In short, this is nuts.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Principle Of Resident...»Reply #5