Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Buckeyeblue

(6,373 posts)

7. Or what if i refuse to be a resident of any state

Reply to MayReasonRule (Reply #3)

Tue Jan 30, 2024, 09:09 AM

Jan 2024

Let's say I have a RV and I'm constantly roaming. There are people like this today. I think they pick a state and get a PO Box and then deal with registration/license renewal as needed, so maybe that's how residency would be defined.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MayReasonRule

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Principle Of Residential Jurisdiction: Abortion Trafficking Bills Are The Opening Salvo [View all] MayReasonRule Jan 2024 OP

Would the opposite be true then? Buckeyeblue Jan 2024 #1

Apples and Oranges. Lochloosa Jan 2024 #2

Would State A's Prohibitions Supplant State B's Permissions Under The Principle Of Residential Jurisdiction? MayReasonRule Jan 2024 #4

If It's Good For The Goose It's Good For The Gander... MayReasonRule Jan 2024 #3

Or what if i refuse to be a resident of any state Buckeyeblue Jan 2024 #7

The Point Is The Absurdity Of The Proposition And An Unfortunate Possibillity Of SCOTUS Supporting Such MayReasonRule Jan 2024 #8

I get that...I'm just trying to take the absurdity further Buckeyeblue Jan 2024 #12

I Agree With Ya' the parameters you outlined further illustrate the absurdity of the proposition. MayReasonRule Jan 2024 #13

So, does this concept then filter down to counties and cities? Silver Gaia Jan 2024 #5

You're Dead On Point. It's An Obscene Cross-Burning Nat-C Absurdity. MayReasonRule Jan 2024 #9

Blatanty unconstitutional. Ms. Toad Jan 2024 #6

You're Dead On Point - Unfortunately Reason Dictates That Those Lacking Reason Will Not Employ Reason MayReasonRule Jan 2024 #10

Yes, all of these laws would be DOA ScratchCat Jan 2024 #11

That sounds an awful lot like "You're not allowed to be free in Canada or a Northern state Aristus Jan 2024 #14

Reframing the terms of the subject limbicnuminousity Jan 2024 #15

Hear, Hear!! MayReasonRule Jan 2024 #16