Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(37,370 posts)
34. But
Fri Feb 2, 2024, 10:55 AM
Feb 2024

Isn't the Special Monitor a part of this case and her report part of the Judge's deliberation. So maybe the OP is not "WRONG"

https://news.yahoo.com/special-monitor-suggests-trump-falsified-071730176.html

Tucked into a footnote in a letter written by a former federal judge, Barbara Jones — the court-appointed special monitor overseeing Donald Trump's New York business-fraud case — is a bombshell that appears to indicate the former president may have engaged in massive tax evasion, The Daily Beast reported.

The letter, first reported by The Messenger, was delivered Friday to update Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron on Jones' findings while reviewing the former president's business dealings through the Trump Organization.


So here we see the findings were done for Judge Engoron. On can only conclude that the findings, which include this suspect loan, were germane to his ruling.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think your idea is correct too! GreenWave Feb 2024 #1
That is what I thought. Including it will solidify his ruling. LiberalFighter Feb 2024 #2
I agree, gab13by13 Feb 2024 #9
Who knows nowadays? But, we are looking at a $370 Million case. Can't see delaying it Silent Type Feb 2024 #3
Then we have Hunter Biden who got caught gab13by13 Feb 2024 #6
It still amounts to less than 10% of the $370 prosecutors are requesting. Why delay for that? Silent Type Feb 2024 #12
As post #2 stated gab13by13 Feb 2024 #13
Just don't think $48 M is reason for a two week delay. Silent Type Feb 2024 #15
Republicans starved and weakened the IRS so they didn't have the personnel to dedicate to a highly complicated summer_in_TX Feb 2024 #21
You wouldn't understand. dchill Feb 2024 #28
There is also the admission of perjury by weiselberg..... getagrip_already Feb 2024 #4
This is what I thought as well. SleeplessinSoCal Feb 2024 #17
THIS malaise Feb 2024 #31
+! struggle4progress Feb 2024 #33
I suspect Trump is trying to get a bond for EJ Carroll damages Jarqui Feb 2024 #5
I stated in several posts gab13by13 Feb 2024 #7
He's already getting threats Jarqui Feb 2024 #27
Might be because of this : yliza Feb 2024 #8
I am sorry, I mean absolutely no disrespect gab13by13 Feb 2024 #10
So much shit by Trump, hard to keep up. triron Feb 2024 #19
This can't be repeated enough edhopper Feb 2024 #32
Yes. That seems right. mcar Feb 2024 #11
It isn't just more fraud InstantGratification Feb 2024 #14
Well explained, gab13by13 Feb 2024 #20
exactly InstantGratification Feb 2024 #23
I've given up on guessing or speculating. Barry Markson Feb 2024 #16
Anither DU'er suggested Presidents' Day, but court would not be in session, niyad Feb 2024 #18
WRONG! brooklynite Feb 2024 #22
Except this isn't criminal Justice Fiendish Thingy Feb 2024 #24
It brings up a good point about moniss Feb 2024 #26
Yep, I think you are correct and the person you responded to is wrong. honest.abe Feb 2024 #35
But edhopper Feb 2024 #34
Reminder that there are TWO parts of the case. brooklynite Feb 2024 #37
I thought the Judge edhopper Feb 2024 #38
He already ruled on dissolution of the Trump businesses... brooklynite Feb 2024 #39
But the article edhopper Feb 2024 #40
This is also beneficial to the E Jean case moniss Feb 2024 #25
no chance he files for BK over this moonshinegnomie Feb 2024 #29
I have a theory Jarqui Feb 2024 #30
Thank you for sharing your theory. It's laid out with a kind of logic that I can follow and totally get. msfiddlestix Feb 2024 #41
Probably considering a steeper penalty. honest.abe Feb 2024 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Engoron Delays Ruli...»Reply #34