Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Jarqui

(10,923 posts)

15. I would not describe it as a "focus"

Reply to applegrove (Reply #14)

Sat Feb 10, 2024, 08:31 PM

Feb 2024

I would describe it as holding more than Hur accountable.

You'll never convince me in a million years that Garland did not see that report before it was released.
He is the AG.
He bears some responsibility.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

1 page: report on Pence holding on to classified documents. [View all] applegrove Feb 2024 OP

K&R 2naSalit Feb 2024 #1

Thamk you for posting this... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #2

Good word, tavernier Feb 2024 #4

Thanks for posting bdamomma Feb 2024 #3

They didn't even ask why manure flies are attracted to his hair? GreenWave Feb 2024 #5

hur did a deep dive et tu Feb 2024 #6

388 pages vs 1? Jarqui Feb 2024 #7

Stop focussing on Garland. It is Robert Hur applegrove Feb 2024 #14

I would not describe it as a "focus" Jarqui Feb 2024 #15

ask stuff like: In whose interest is it in to attack Merrick Garland? applegrove Feb 2024 #16

I think things are messed up enough as it is Jarqui Feb 2024 #17

We should remember Pence and Biden were both Vice President when the transgressions occurred. sop Feb 2024 #8

+1. An important point. dalton99a Feb 2024 #10

Garland's defenders will find a way to rationalize this 😡 Arazi Feb 2024 #9

Blame Republicans, Trumpians and Hur specifically. Not Biden's AG. applegrove Feb 2024 #13

Kick dalton99a Feb 2024 #11

But the DoJ didn't look to be "political" in doing this, one page. republianmushroom Feb 2024 #12