Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
Wed Feb 14, 2024, 10:38 AM Feb 2024

Before people overthink the polling discrepancy in NY-3..... [View all]

It's important to keep in mind that there was a significant development in the late days of the campaign that shifted votes to Suozzi. A major issue in the campaign was immigration and the border (nb: neither Pilip nor Suozzi ran heavily on reproductive rights). Pilip was running ads about the "border crisis", and Suzzi was running a defensive action on the issue. What changed things was Trump and Johnson spiking the border deal legislation in the last week which damaged Pilip's campaign, and allowed Suozzi to assert his (you may not like this) "reach across the aisle and work together" message.

The issue had all the makings of a political storm. Illegal border crossings reached an all-time high in December, and the arrival of more than 170,000 migrants in New York City has brought the sense of chaos close to home.

Rather than shrink from the issue, though, Mr. Suozzi made the migrant crisis a centerpiece of his campaign. He called for Mr. Biden to close the border and went on local news to call for the deportation of a group of migrant men charged with assaulting police officers in Times Square.

When his opponent, Mazi Pilip, condemned a bipartisan Senate deal that included stiff border security provisions that conservatives had demanded, Mr. Suozzi went on the attack, accusing her of putting partisanship over national security.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/13/nyregion/suozzi-democrats-win-santos.html


23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maybe Johnny2X2X Feb 2024 #1
The last poll (JL Partners) was by a pro-Republican firm. brooklynite Feb 2024 #2
You would probably need exit poll data or to do more interviews to BootinUp Feb 2024 #3
I don't think it had a big impact either way Renew Deal Feb 2024 #4
Strongly disagree... brooklynite Feb 2024 #8
But does it sway votes? Renew Deal Feb 2024 #10
What issue do you think is driving them? brooklynite Feb 2024 #14
It isn't just going to affect the ny3 race. Dems will bludgeon the GOP with it from here till november ColinC Feb 2024 #5
Having a workable government, more than the particular issue, may be the true factor karynnj Feb 2024 #6
It seems we're always... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #7
President Biden and Congressman-elect Suozzi disagree with you... brooklynite Feb 2024 #12
As you might know... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #15
Siena College and Emerson College don't do "clickbait"... brooklynite Feb 2024 #16
Well then... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #18
Polls aren't wrong if they're not exact. brooklynite Feb 2024 #20
Uh huh BannonsLiver Feb 2024 #21
If conspiracy theories give you comfort..... brooklynite Feb 2024 #22
Is pointing out someone was just plain WRONG a conspiracy theory? BannonsLiver Feb 2024 #23
You were still saying very close the day of the election NoRethugFriends Feb 2024 #9
I was basing my assessment on what Tom Suozzi last told me. brooklynite Feb 2024 #11
Because polling sucks as a predictive tool getagrip_already Feb 2024 #13
Looks like it's CYA Wednesday. BannonsLiver Feb 2024 #17
with tears in his eyes? Think. Again. Feb 2024 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Before people overthink t...