Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)

24. The one who said it began in 19 was an employer who was fired and she blamed Fanni

Reply to Pototan (Original post)

Mon Feb 19, 2024, 11:48 AM

Feb 2024

What you are suggesting would mean Fanni and others committed perjury.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My explanation of the Fani Willis-Nathan Wade relationship [View all] Pototan Feb 2024 OP

Yes, everything you said could ring true. Quakerfriend Feb 2024 #1

I am trying to dispell the notion Pototan Feb 2024 #3

I just don't see how or why... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #2

There is a question of being "untruthful" Pototan Feb 2024 #4

So what, how is that a conflict of interest? gab13by13 Feb 2024 #6

Lying under oath in a deposition is serious Pototan Feb 2024 #8

I see... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #10

And pretty rich, seeing as how it's coming from tsf's lawyers. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #19

I thought the opposing lawyers were representing other defendants besides Trump? MichMan Feb 2024 #30

Especially for people who are part of the legal system as attorneys or prosecutors MichMan Feb 2024 #15

Knowing each other in 2019 isnt a romantic relationship oldmanlynn Feb 2024 #11

That's my point Pototan Feb 2024 #16

This right here. All fuckin day. What is the reason? onecaliberal Feb 2024 #17

This whole thing is nothing but distractive b.s. ificandream Feb 2024 #5

Damn, I was about to give you a heart. gab13by13 Feb 2024 #7

THIS! eom BlueMTexpat Feb 2024 #9

Michael Roman, the idiot who accused Fani Willis of having an affair japple Feb 2024 #12

He's not an idiot--he's using a very deliberate tactic. Mess with us, we'll mess you up Maeve Feb 2024 #18

A delaying tactic, Even if Willis and Wade are fired for cause, the case against Trump remains. dutch777 Feb 2024 #13

I really doubt they will be. ificandream Feb 2024 #14

Exactly. It's a modern day dunking stool. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #20

In her 2020 campaign for DA, Fani Willis pleged she would never date anyone who worked under her. elocs Feb 2024 #21

I think she said it as there were rumors of harrassment by the incumbent karynnj Feb 2024 #23

You very eloquently say what i was thinking karynnj Feb 2024 #22

The one who said it began in 19 was an employer who was fired and she blamed Fanni Demsrule86 Feb 2024 #24

What I'm saying is the opposite of your interpretation Pototan Feb 2024 #31

Once the judge rules not to disqualify her, she needs to recuse immediately gulliver Feb 2024 #25

When the judge determines there no there there, she will not recuse. CincyDem Feb 2024 #27

you have zero reason to assume that NoRethugFriends Feb 2024 #28

They both testified it was 2022 not 2023 as you wrotel brush Feb 2024 #26

Wouldn't that make Wade's prior affidavits inaccurate? MichMan Feb 2024 #29

How do you mean? brush Feb 2024 #33

You are correct and Pototan Feb 2024 #32