Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: Cellphone data raises questions about start of Willis-Wade relationship [View all]H2O Man
(74,359 posts)81. The sky is falling!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
185 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BREAKING: Cellphone data raises questions about start of Willis-Wade relationship [View all]
Cattledog
Feb 2024
OP
+ agree. The judge had accepted they had a sexual relationship per their filings. Only issue here (per the judge) is
iluvtennis
Feb 2024
#37
The allegation is that this case, for which Willis hired Trump, gives her a financial benefit
Ms. Toad
Feb 2024
#122
If they lied at the hearing and it's provable it could have a big impact on the case. nt
LAS14
Feb 2024
#6
Do you remember how many times you went to the mall or church or what ever from 3 years ago? All
sinkingfeeling
Feb 2024
#13
False relationship and intimate relationship are different and this is also conflating the two
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#75
The cellphone data appears to just indicate that he was in the area -- and it's apparently a busy area
fishwax
Feb 2024
#178
It's really frustrating to see how little this has to do with the subject at hand and
Dyedinthewoolliberal
Feb 2024
#41
They made no conflicting statements under oath, adults understand difference between lovers and friends and when ea
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#94
Agree. But then there was the lawsuit that coulda been thrown out? Not
Laura PourMeADrink
Feb 2024
#77
The question is whether they misrepresented the initiation date of their activities.
Tickle
Feb 2024
#103
They already claimed they knew each other before having an intimate relationship.
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#76
It is, misleading MAGA is conflating intimate relationship with relationship and they know it
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#78
Willis said in her 2020 campaign that she would not date anyone who was under her.
elocs
Feb 2024
#15
They said they knew each other from way back when, intimate relationship is different than relationship. You know that!
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#79
2,000 phone calls and 12,000 text messages between them before Wade was hired.
Cattledog
Feb 2024
#23
Right ?!? This is so freakin creepy that this needs to be explained!!! Here in DU!!
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#84
"Appears to be true" if you listen to the fucking MAGA shitstains take on this nonsense.
SoFlaBro
Feb 2024
#97
Evidence of what? They were in the same vicinity? There is a giant fucking leap to romance based on cell data.
SoFlaBro
Feb 2024
#135
So far mostly MAGQ believes they're lying, The other adults understand a difference between friendship and lovers
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#86
I just checked my text messages. I have over 51,000 messages to and from one person
ecstatic
Feb 2024
#163
First world problems, I'm sure the newspapers in Ukraine are stunned by Fani & Nathan's behavior.
SalamanderSleeps
Feb 2024
#35
Mostly to MAGA the rest of America's adults understand the difference between a friendship and a romance
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#88
The beginning of a relationship is not always clear which Willis said. So what if he was in the area.
live love laugh
Feb 2024
#31
If they perjured themselves about the relationship's timeline, it makes their other testimony less reliable.
femmedem
Feb 2024
#69
They've already admitted their friendship began before he was hired, Why is this even on DU?!
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#89
Which phone logs prove none of that , even if they were sexting still proves the intimate relationship didn't begin
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#96
This is false on its face. The court doesn't get to say when you're in an intimate relationship and when you're not
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#106
Being married or not is obviously clear cut. That's not necessarily so otherwise.
live love laugh
Feb 2024
#124
No it's not, individuals get to define "intimate" relationship not anyone else.
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#151
A lie by itself is not perjury. The testimony has to be germane to the proceedings. This fails on relevance to the case.
SoFlaBro
Feb 2024
#137
The legal system generally holds prosecutors and officers of the court to a much higher standard than other witnesses
MichMan
Feb 2024
#185
Anything, anyone else in that neighborhood? Do the records pinpoint the actual condo?
Freethinker65
Feb 2024
#39
This inquiry carries as much weight and legitimacy to me as the Hunter Biden hearings.
Torchlight
Feb 2024
#40
This is a solid effort to destroy her case against Trump. If the Trumpistas succeed...
Hekate
Feb 2024
#47
No, it's about actual impropriety. If they can't prove it, it is meaningless. If it WERE about the
Scrivener7
Feb 2024
#61
I agree. My hope is that by giving it a hearing he thinks he can prevent it from metastisizing and
Scrivener7
Feb 2024
#105
Fannie Willis gets to have friendships and consensual lovers as much as she wants,none of our business
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#90
"vicinity of her condo " means little in context and you know that. He never claimed he wasn't in vecinty of her condo
uponit7771
Feb 2024
#154
Wade lives in Cobb County Georgia a good 25 miles from Willis. Beginning to think
Silent Type
Feb 2024
#156
Trump and his co-defendants absolutely have investigators working for them
Sympthsical
Feb 2024
#117
The Express is a right-wing rag with a dubious record of accurate reporting.
madaboutharry
Feb 2024
#157
Ali Raza has been looking into Willis' financial situation, here are a couple of links:
sop
Feb 2024
#166
More rat-fucking. If the defense has proof of a conflict of interest,
struggle4progress
Feb 2024
#153