Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judge Loose Cannon declares Trump NOT GUILTY [View all]ancianita
(43,309 posts)33. Here are Cannon's "Preliminary Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms on Counts 1-32 Only"
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490069/407/united-states-v-trump/
The whole thing as much as tells the jury what their only verdict can be -- Dismiss -- which throws out all the other counts and the whole indictment. Luckily, Jack Smith is a few chess moves ahead of this judge.
With respect to the proposed language pertinent to the issue of unauthorized possession specifically, the
parties must engage with the following competing scenarios and offer alternative draft text that assumes each
scenario to be a correct formulation of the law to be issued to the jury, while reserving counterarguments.
(a) In a prosecution of a former president for allegedly retaining documents in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 793(e), a jury is permitted to examine a record retained by a former president in
his/her personal possession at the end of his/her presidency and make a factual finding as
to whether the government has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that it is personal or
presidential using the definitions set forth in the Presidential Records Act (PRA).3
(b) A president has sole authority under the PRA to categorize records as personal or
presidential during his/her presidency. Neither a court nor a jury is permitted to make or
review such a categorization decision. Although there is no formal means in the PRA by
which a president is to make that categorization, an outgoing presidents decision to
exclude what he/she considers to be personal records from presidential records transmitted
to the National Archives and Records Administration constitutes a presidents
categorization of those records as personal under the PRA.
parties must engage with the following competing scenarios and offer alternative draft text that assumes each
scenario to be a correct formulation of the law to be issued to the jury, while reserving counterarguments.
(a) In a prosecution of a former president for allegedly retaining documents in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 793(e), a jury is permitted to examine a record retained by a former president in
his/her personal possession at the end of his/her presidency and make a factual finding as
to whether the government has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that it is personal or
presidential using the definitions set forth in the Presidential Records Act (PRA).3
(b) A president has sole authority under the PRA to categorize records as personal or
presidential during his/her presidency. Neither a court nor a jury is permitted to make or
review such a categorization decision. Although there is no formal means in the PRA by
which a president is to make that categorization, an outgoing presidents decision to
exclude what he/she considers to be personal records from presidential records transmitted
to the National Archives and Records Administration constitutes a presidents
categorization of those records as personal under the PRA.
The whole thing as much as tells the jury what their only verdict can be -- Dismiss -- which throws out all the other counts and the whole indictment. Luckily, Jack Smith is a few chess moves ahead of this judge.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Read the article. You are right. Don't think this is as nefarious as folks will believe.
Silent Type
Mar 2024
#22
Too bad they don't have pictures of them together at Mara a lago or a record of their telephone calls.
kimbutgar
Mar 2024
#28
Bradley Moss explained the best way the 11th Circuit will deal with her without a writ of Mandamus.
ancianita
Mar 2024
#32
Here are Cannon's "Preliminary Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms on Counts 1-32 Only"
ancianita
Mar 2024
#33