Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Eko

(7,415 posts)

7. That's a good point but you need to flip it.

Reply to brooklynite (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 20, 2024, 07:59 PM

Mar 20

I understand the reasoning behind not letting a state take someone off a federal election. That follows the concept that the federal govt has say over state govt and I agree that we cant have states taking whoever they want off federal elections.
Flip it though, all of the justices that voted for the Colorado decision then flipped and said state laws over-ride federal laws for texas are the ones not being consistent. The three liberal justices who voted against Colorado and against texas are.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Corrupt SCOTUS? Yeah. [View all] NowISeetheLight Mar 20 OP

SCOTUS makes it all up. Irish_Dem Mar 20 #1

There is zero doubt in mine that the six republicans BlueKota Mar 20 #2

The Supreme Court that said Trump couldn't be kept off the ballot was a 9-0 vote. Are they ALL corrupt? brooklynite Mar 20 #3

That's a good point but you need to flip it. Eko Mar 20 #7

Ummm..."concurrence" anyone? dpibel Mar 20 #8

"It just confirms to me that SCOTUS is completely corrupted." J_William_Ryan Mar 20 #4

What a coincidence BOSSHOG Mar 20 #5

The rise of judicial fascism is upon us. GreenWave Mar 20 #6

The duties of SCOTUS justices are extreme. Under The Radar Mar 21 #9