Could you be a fair and impartial jurist in a Trump trial?

[hlthe2b]

7. Yes. I've served on a murder trial and several years later, an attempted murder trial...

The former was conducted poorly with "evidence" based largely on innuendo, a questionable, noncredible eyewitness, no useful forensics, and a suggested motive that seemed outlandish. I went into the trial thinking "guilty" and the guy was not especially "likable" (in fact, he was just the opposite). But in deliberations, it was clear all of us WANTED to be presented with more compelling evidence to allow us to convict. But we were not. We acquitted. I google his name periodically, fearful that he might go on to kill someone else if we were indeed wrong. So, far, nothing... But it did haunt me a bit.

The second was more clear-cut and resulted in a ready conviction.

But, I know I can be fair--even when I don't want to be.