Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's time for the US to STOP blocking Palestinian statehood at the UN [View all]chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)38. And it's time to stop calling that murderous, racist thug, by a nickname: "Bibi".
http://mondoweiss.net/2012/10/stop-calling-him-bibi.html
-edit-
A nickname humanizes a politician. It makes them seem more affectionate. Very few if any politicians are referred to by their nicknames. Do the media call Prime Minister Cameron David? Do they say, Francois, the president of France? They don't.
When Joe Biden repeatedly called Netanyahu Bibi last night in the debate, yes it bothers me, because our politicians are way too soft on Israel. But Biden is namedropping in that way because the mainstream press calls him that. And that's the real issue here: when you see discussions on TV or in the press, Netanyahu is often referred to by his nickname.
Stop and think if he had an English nickname. Let's call him Ricky-- and every time Netanyahu came up, he was called "Ricky." "Ricky says Israel wants peace in the Middle East.... Ricky says Israel is just protecting itself in Gaza... Ricky says let's be very careful of Iran developing a bomb." Do you see how absurd that sounds? No one would call him Ricky, and if they did it it would tone down what he really stands for and what he really is.
Does Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have a nickname? He may well have one for all we know. But the mainstream press wouldn't use it, because it would serve the same purpose, to humanize and minimize. When Ahmadinejad is a very bad man too.
-edit-
-edit-
A nickname humanizes a politician. It makes them seem more affectionate. Very few if any politicians are referred to by their nicknames. Do the media call Prime Minister Cameron David? Do they say, Francois, the president of France? They don't.
When Joe Biden repeatedly called Netanyahu Bibi last night in the debate, yes it bothers me, because our politicians are way too soft on Israel. But Biden is namedropping in that way because the mainstream press calls him that. And that's the real issue here: when you see discussions on TV or in the press, Netanyahu is often referred to by his nickname.
Stop and think if he had an English nickname. Let's call him Ricky-- and every time Netanyahu came up, he was called "Ricky." "Ricky says Israel wants peace in the Middle East.... Ricky says Israel is just protecting itself in Gaza... Ricky says let's be very careful of Iran developing a bomb." Do you see how absurd that sounds? No one would call him Ricky, and if they did it it would tone down what he really stands for and what he really is.
Does Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have a nickname? He may well have one for all we know. But the mainstream press wouldn't use it, because it would serve the same purpose, to humanize and minimize. When Ahmadinejad is a very bad man too.
-edit-
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's time for the US to STOP blocking Palestinian statehood at the UN [View all]
Ken Burch
Nov 2012
OP
the 'beauty' opart of this is that there is precious little the US can do to stop it
azurnoir
Nov 2012
#12
If Israel's leaders really want to be pragmatic, they need to align themselves now
Ken Burch
Nov 2012
#21
When Egypt ruled Gaza the residents were second class citizens at best
ProgressiveProfessor
Nov 2012
#46
Are you saying there is no responsibility attributable to the outside agitators?
ProgressiveProfessor
Nov 2012
#50
The charter is just words. It should go...but they'd never be able to carry it out anyway.
Ken Burch
Nov 2012
#44
I would remind everyone that under US law, such a status change would cause
ProgressiveProfessor
Nov 2012
#14
As long as Likud remains dominant inside Israel, there will be no peace process at all.
Selatius
Nov 2012
#18
It's certainly a hell of a lot more likely that they would than by making them
Ken Burch
Nov 2012
#29
And it's time to stop calling that murderous, racist thug, by a nickname: "Bibi".
chimpymustgo
Nov 2012
#38