Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So they want to find Trump $1000 for gag order violations? [View all]getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)14. just got interesting....
from cnn....
Judge wants to hear assertion under oath that Trump believed he wasn't violating gag order
Judge Juan Merchan said he wants to hear an assertion under oath that Donald Trump believed he wasn't violating the gag order when he made the posts in question.
Judge Juan Merchan said he wants to hear an assertion under oath that Donald Trump believed he wasn't violating the gag order when he made the posts in question.
Under oath means he can find he lied. Under oath. Or if he says he defied the order, take appropriate action. Or he can take the fifth. Then the judge can rule anyway.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Believe it or not, the DA and the judge know more about these situations are handled than anyone here on DU
onenote
Apr 2024
#25
Maybe they needed to do that as a first offense so they can put him in jail next time
Walleye
Apr 2024
#11
Different rules for civil trials than criminal trials. No limit on penalty in former.
onenote
Apr 2024
#30
Are you suggesting that if it was anyone else the judge would ignore the law and impose a penalty that goes beyond what
onenote
Apr 2024
#32
I doubt the law is going to be changed, and certainly not while this trial is ongoing.
onenote
Apr 2024
#33
The prosecutors allege 10 separate violations and are seeking the maximum $1000 fine for each violation
onenote
Apr 2024
#34
You were right about the individual fines. Turns out it was ten $1000 fines the prosecutors asked for. nt
sl8
Apr 2024
#41
There seems to be confusion over the way NY law treats contempt. This article will help clear things up.
onenote
Apr 2024
#38