Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Tribetime

(7,105 posts)

15. Just their line of questioning was so ridiculous

Reply to TexasDem69 (Reply #1)

Thu Apr 25, 2024, 10:35 PM

Apr 2024

Bending over backwards to make any argument they could in Trump's favor.. Clearly The Supreme Court justices, some of them are.As corrupt as sin

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Talitha benfranklin1776 Attilatheblond BlueKota wnylib wnylib flying_wahini Think. Again.musette_sf uponit7771

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NOW SHOULD WE PACK THE COURT? [View all] Iwasthere Apr 2024 OP

What did the Supreme Court do today? TexasDem69 Apr 2024 #1

Just their line of questioning was so ridiculous Tribetime Apr 2024 #15

They will roll on the side of obvious law then make dems feel like they were given a favor uponit7771 Apr 2024 #38

Wait until they decree Presidential Immunity C_U_L8R Apr 2024 #2

I don't particularly like the phrase "pack the court" sdfernando Apr 2024 #3

Unpack the court. It's all locked up. Needs to expand. Earth-shine Apr 2024 #19

This! Packing the court was what Mitch McConnell did Poiuyt Apr 2024 #25

As a general matter, I think more judges should be added anyway. The country legitimately needs more federal judges In It to Win It Apr 2024 #4

Why do you imagine Democrats in Congress or President Biden would support this? brooklynite Apr 2024 #5

Yep. I thought it sounded good when Buttigieg mentioned it in the run up Earthrise Apr 2024 #6

I was reluctant to agree when it was first mentioned wnylib Apr 2024 #20

You say this as if it were possible. Groundhawg Apr 2024 #7

It might be soon if the House balance shifts. wnylib Apr 2024 #21

Well, we won't Polybius Apr 2024 #24

have you forgotten Biden is against it? Groundhawg Apr 2024 #31

He does sometimes shift his perspective when a situation calls for it. wnylib Apr 2024 #32

Have you forgotten Biden is against it? Groundhawg Apr 2024 #33

I agree that currently there is nothing that we can do. wnylib Apr 2024 #34

because Biden is Awesome. he knows what's best for us. nt Groundhawg Apr 2024 #35

I agree that Biden is awesome and the best president in my lifetime. wnylib Apr 2024 #36

I Trust joe's position. nt Groundhawg Apr 2024 #37

Well, my mind is changing on the matter iemanja Apr 2024 #8

Do you want to add two justices? TexasDem69 Apr 2024 #9

No, just have one judge per district. haele Apr 2024 #10

Yep. Thirteen districts, thirteen justices. calimary Apr 2024 #26

It's actually the Federal Court of Appeals divided into 13 circuits, but I agree. Afterall The Federal Appeals Courts Cheezoholic Apr 2024 #27

Aha! Good. I wasn't sure of the wording. calimary Apr 2024 #29

Unfortunately we don't have enough Democrats willing to junk the filibuster and get this done... Silent3 Apr 2024 #11

More specifically, you don't have enough Democrats willing to add more Justices... brooklynite Apr 2024 #13

The gravity of the situation is reaching a serious point Iwasthere Apr 2024 #30

It would only be a temporary fix. LeftInTX Apr 2024 #12

Via what mechanism? mzmolly Apr 2024 #14

It might be easier to unpack it. niyad Apr 2024 #16

I agree LeftInTX Apr 2024 #17

Pack the court now and pack it hard. Trueblue1968 Apr 2024 #18

I think we are way past trouble Zilli Apr 2024 #22

No Polybius Apr 2024 #23

UNPACK the court, or live under fascist rule forever. dalton99a Apr 2024 #28