Smith isn't going to move to have Cannon removed. People should stop thinking it will happen. Or that it can.

[getagrip_already]

6. You are wrong on many points....

I'm going to disregard your first point as nonmaterial. It simply doesn't matter. I haven't heard anyone claim that, fwiw, but if they did it wouldn't matter, the circuit isn't going to act on it.

And of all the missed points you brought up, you didn't touch on the most important issue.

Namely that she is showing improper preference to the defendent. It doesn't matter that he appointed her. It doesn't matter that she voted for him. What matters is the pattern of decisions she has handed down in defiance of law, practice, and procedure. Some of it may be her inexperience, but a great deal of it is to benefit the defendrnt.

The 11th circuit has already rebuked her twice. They have a three strike rule.

So the real question is if Smith doesn't appeal a decision to the 11th circuit (and so far, there hasn't been the opportunity to) with recusal, and goes to jeopardy with Canon, did the ag stop him. He does have grounds.