and then did "tortious interference with existing contracts" by scaring advertisers off Xhitter.
Xhitter assured advertisers that their ads would not sponsor Nazi content,
and they now assert that Media Matters used atypical means to make
that protection fail.
It needs to be pointed out that the Media Matters revelations coincided
with Emerald Boy going full mask off with his own personal racism.
Several advertisers cite the reputational risks associated with
Musk's public embrace of replacement theory.
It created an account on the X platform, manipulated the platform to
maximize the likelihood that the platform would pair prominent advertisers’ content with
antisemitic posts, and then scrolled through an exceptionally large amount of content to induce the
desired pairing. Id. ¶¶ 47-54. Then, on November 16, 2023, it maliciously published a false,
defamatory, and misleading article claiming that X was responsible for antisemitic and hateful
content being paired with advertisers’ posts. Id. ¶ 46. This article asserted that X’s platform
displayed prominent advertisers’ paid content alongside antisemitic and other highly unsavory user
content, falsely and maliciously depicting these results as representative of the typical user
experience on the X platform.
https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/X-v-Media-Matters-Response-to-Motion-to-Dismiss-3-29-2024.pdf
Therefore, it is the fault of the Big Bad Media Matters that Xhitter is now worth
far less than what Musk paid for it.
= new reply since forum marked as read