Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(4,557 posts)

6. Correct

Mon Jul 1, 2024, 01:39 PM

Jul 2024

Which means no additional requirements can be added.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

But can an EO contradict the Constitution? intrepidity Jul 2024 #1

The Constitution is silent on this Stinky The Clown Jul 2024 #2

Ummm not sure.... intrepidity Jul 2024 #5

Correct Zeitghost Jul 2024 #6

scotus wouldnt be getagrip_already Jul 2024 #9

I like this. Dave Bowman Jul 2024 #3

Maybe he can finesse it by stating intrepidity Jul 2024 #10

Fully OK with that. Justice matters. Jul 2024 #11

I mean he can sign any EO he likes, it doesn't mean he can enforce it. tritsofme Jul 2024 #7

K&R UTUSN Jul 2024 #8