Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(22,179 posts)

10. Didn't they rule that ONLY certain evidence can be used?

Mon Jul 1, 2024, 03:33 PM

Jul 2024

If they did, how can they tie the prosecutors hands BEFORE trial? (Am i not understanding this?)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How in the hell can THIS SC decide what evidemnce is alllowed? [View all] bluestarone Jul 2024 OP

let's ask scotus..... nt getagrip_already Jul 2024 #1

Just thinking Joe could issue EO staing national emergency bluestarone Jul 2024 #2

Because they believe they are the power, which they are, for now anyway. republianmushroom Jul 2024 #3

I asked this in another thread ScratchCat Jul 2024 #4

they can't...that's why their chicken shit non decision was to agingdem Jul 2024 #5

Is this a serious question? Can one be that naive? NoRethugFriends Jul 2024 #6

It takes some time to wrap your head around pure evil. Irish_Dem Jul 2024 #8

The US Supreme Court is at the very top of the food chain. Irish_Dem Jul 2024 #7

They haven't brooklynite Jul 2024 #9

Didn't they rule that ONLY certain evidence can be used? bluestarone Jul 2024 #10

Could you help me out with this part, here's what I read ... uponit7771 Jul 2024 #12

If nobody stops you, you have the will, and you have the resources you can TheKentuckian Jul 2024 #13