Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Raven123

(7,383 posts)

7. Please don't get me wrong

Reply to Silent Type (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 1, 2024, 04:44 PM

Jul 2024

I have no delusions about the courts. Given the ruling, I just wonder if Smith’s team will shift gears. They will have to re-evaluate the J6 case. I just thought the documents case would percolate to the top if indeed TFG’s crimes occurred after he left office. And some did.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Silent Type

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Doesn't the SCOTUS ruling make the documents case more important? [View all] Raven123 Jul 2024 OP

Nothing is going to happen in the document case as long as Loose Cannon RockRaven Jul 2024 #1

Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion that the appointment of Jack Smith was illegal... Mr.WeRP Jul 2024 #2

They have already ruled Smith's appointment was legal previously. nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2024 #3

Just saying what happened Mr.WeRP Jul 2024 #6

It makes the election critical. Nothing else matters. Either we win the WH and Congress or our Country is gone. JohnSJ Jul 2024 #4

I bet he took records before leaving office. But that was illegal, so don't think ruling Silent Type Jul 2024 #5

Please don't get me wrong Raven123 Jul 2024 #7