Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hunter

(40,862 posts)

3. We don't need to destroy ANY natural landscapes to build more housing.

Reply to canetoad (Reply #2)

Mon Jul 8, 2024, 01:43 AM

Jul 2024

There's plenty of room available on land humans have already trashed.

We ought to be rebuilding our existing cities, turning them into attractive affordable places where car ownership is unnecessary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Coventina misanthrope Hermit-The-Prog diane in sf Arger68

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This tree has lived for at least 13,000 years. California's housing crisis could doom it. [View all] Celerity Jul 2024 OP

K&R for exposure diva77 Jul 2024 #1

There must be another solution canetoad Jul 2024 #2

We don't need to destroy ANY natural landscapes to build more housing. hunter Jul 2024 #3

KnR Hekate Jul 2024 #4

CA's housing crisis swong19104 Jul 2024 #5

my earliest traumatic memory The Wandering Harper Jul 2024 #6