Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Times editor says he won't defend democracy. [View all]peggysue2
(12,637 posts)6. Democracy is a partisan issue????
Good thing our troops didn't take that stance on D-Day!
WTF is the NYT's talking about other than announcing to the American public that our democratic experiment is NOT worth defending, that our nearly 250-year old Republic will go unprotected by the esteemed members of the NYT's editorial board because polls are the only thing that matter.
And this is suppose to be the 'balanced' approach?
If the fascists were to win, I hope Joe Kahn is ready to walk the plank because that's the future of anyone attached to the media: Be total lapdogs to Herr Trump and his flying monkeys or watch your career and life crater.
Disgusting, unAmerican and beyond vile!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
16 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just this ... "their credibility is shot. They're not reporting news. They're pushing for Trump."
NotHardly
Jul 2024
#17
The opposite of democracy is dictatorship, a form of government in which a ruler or small clique wield
sop
Jul 2024
#44
WTF is he in the newspaper business taking advantage of Freedon of the Press.
Historic NY
Jul 2024
#7
The NYT operates by virtue of the Constitutionally guaranteed First Amendment.
bluesbassman
Jul 2024
#10
That's absolutely fucking delusional. Imagine having the same attitude toward Hitler?
Oneironaut
Jul 2024
#18
Read the entire article - this country of ours is in REAL trouble unless people stand up and say NO.
NoMoreRepugs
Jul 2024
#23
I suspect most subscribers to NYT know what's at stake. Many don't care, but they know.
Silent Type
Jul 2024
#31
So if it's polls they are using then who the fuck are they polling? It can't be democrats.
chowder66
Jul 2024
#59
I once believed it was impossible that people would vote for trump. After 2016 and a really close call in 2020, I
Silent Type
Jul 2024
#61
If 91% of readers are democrats how do they come up with polls on the crap they publish?
chowder66
Jul 2024
#62
These polls aren't conducted like that. In the first place, they aren't polling their readers. They are polling a sample
Silent Type
Jul 2024
#64
I don't do social media, but I really hope the young people hear about this stance on the part oftheNYT.
BComplex
Jul 2024
#37
How will he feel when the fascists prevail and they cancel the First Amendment?
Baitball Blogger
Jul 2024
#48
The plain fact that they didn't fire 'Haggerman' when Fucker Carlson said she was a reliable asset
wolfie001
Jul 2024
#54
great piece and it's truly disgusting to see what the NYTimes thinks about democracy
LymphocyteLover
Jul 2024
#57