Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So we let the rich donors run the party now? [View all]Daveigh
(62 posts)20. Been this way since the Founding Fathers decided "democracy" was a dirty word
Im certainly not a believer in the philosophy that only the wealthy should control politics, but that stance is nothing new.
https://www.voanews.com/a/usa_all-about-america_todays-democracy-isnt-exactly-what-wealthy-us-founding-fathers-envisioned/6201097.html
Americas Founding Fathers were among the wealthiest people in the Colonies when they drafted and signed the Constitution, and thats pretty much who they expected to continue to guide the young nation.
It was never meant to be a sort of direct democracy, where all Americans would get to cast a ballot on all issues, says Andrew Wehrman, an associate professor of history at Central Michigan University. The vote itself, they thought, ought to be reserved for people of wealth and education, but they certainly didn't want to restrict all those other kinds of political participation.
The founders expected the common people, the poor and uneducated, to participate indirectly, through their local government, at town halls and meetings and through protest actions like boycotts.
Some of the founders were particularly concerned about populism and mob rule.
These were the kinds [of people] that thought that democracy was a dirty word. Even John Adams said stuff like that. He didn't want poor people to vote, he didn't want women to vote, Wehrman says.
It was never meant to be a sort of direct democracy, where all Americans would get to cast a ballot on all issues, says Andrew Wehrman, an associate professor of history at Central Michigan University. The vote itself, they thought, ought to be reserved for people of wealth and education, but they certainly didn't want to restrict all those other kinds of political participation.
The founders expected the common people, the poor and uneducated, to participate indirectly, through their local government, at town halls and meetings and through protest actions like boycotts.
Some of the founders were particularly concerned about populism and mob rule.
These were the kinds [of people] that thought that democracy was a dirty word. Even John Adams said stuff like that. He didn't want poor people to vote, he didn't want women to vote, Wehrman says.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep - and Dems did not fix that when they had WH and both houses of Congress...
polichick
Jul 2024
#8
You don't know why he dropped out any more than anyone else outside of his close circle.
TwilightZone
Jul 2024
#2
I have an idea, let's shower the negative nellies with LOVE and POSITIVITY
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2024
#51
They wanted Kamala Harris out, too, but it looks like support for Harris is growing by leaps and bounds.
Mister Ed
Jul 2024
#9
It is a wonderful moment for the majority of Dems, the ones that were hoping for Biden to step down. nt
DontBelieveEastisEas
Jul 2024
#22
Kamala and Pete Buttigieg said many times President Biden exhausts the younger staff
ViewObsessed
Jul 2024
#59
OMG, you cannot be serious. Sometimes adults deal with situations that are nuanced and two things
still-prayin4rain
Jul 2024
#70
The overwhelming majority of AVERAGE Dems wanted Bided to step down.
DontBelieveEastisEas
Jul 2024
#17
Something I've been thinking over since I saw the footage from the Clooney fundraiser
AZSkiffyGeek
Jul 2024
#80
I think some of them have leaked, we just accepted the reasons the administration provided
AZSkiffyGeek
Jul 2024
#83
Yep, and they can vote for them on their own also. I will vote for Harris
Blue Full Moon
Jul 2024
#31
sigh. Today, according to Act Blue, over $30 Million has poured in from small-dollar donors for Kamala
Hekate
Jul 2024
#41
I really don't care at this point. I'm just glad they are sacrificing their own money to help us win with Harris
Quixote1818
Jul 2024
#42
Rich donors didn't raise 47 million in 7 hours. This was small donors. The people have spoken with their wallet
Pisces
Jul 2024
#56
Pelosi, Schiff, Raskin, Schumer, Senators and House members are not rich donors.
Irish_Dem
Jul 2024
#76