Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(77,714 posts)
9. Agree On Official Duties
Mon Aug 5, 2024, 04:05 PM
Aug 2024

As all actions were specifically connected to the election, it seems they were associated to his CANDIDACY. They're actions in support of a candidate, not the official actions of the office.
Of course, I'm not talking about fine points of law. Just seems obvious to me that these actions were part of a campaign for a person that lost.
Now, they could try to pass the tale that he needed to act because he was obligated to do something about a rigged election. I think that's weak because they've had 45 months to present evidence & none yet exists.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How do you think Judge Ch...»Reply #9