Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The "quote from Jane Goodall" in the trending "Ladies & Gentlemen, Jane Goodall !!!" thread ISN'T from Jane Goodall [View all]highplainsdem
(62,301 posts)10. I sent them email. As I did yesterday, and they ignored it despite being online and posting other OPs.
I've tried to check quotes found online ever since discovering how many were either invented or wrongly attributed. Sometimes it's incredibly disappointing to find out the quote's completely fake or at least credited to the wrong person.
Bad as it is now, though, this is going to seem like the golden age of internet reliability as AI adds more misinformation, whether as misinformation intended by the AI user or just hallucinations from the AI that aren't caught before something gets put online.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The "quote from Jane Goodall" in the trending "Ladies & Gentlemen, Jane Goodall !!!" thread ISN'T from Jane Goodall [View all]
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
OP
I agree. The failure to correct is really disappointing - and surprising on this board. Don't usually see
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#19
You're welcome! Today they also wanted to know where they could buy a Deadheads for Kamala print
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#7
They occasionally post something quite interesting, from a good source. But they don't always check
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#22
That person might not have seen the correctives posted to him/her/them - their latest activity is 432 PM CT
progree
Sep 2024
#8
I sent them email. As I did yesterday, and they ignored it despite being online and posting other OPs.
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#10
They're back on DU, posted a reply in another thread at 5:43 CT. And now another OP. No reply to
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#14
Some people just need the attention and Rec's I guess. That post is up to 96 recs now
progree
Sep 2024
#29
Reminds me of some who posted here years ago, and was PPRed back in around 2016.
GoCubsGo
Sep 2024
#26
I've been getting some deja vu vibes about this one, so you may have something there.
ms liberty
Sep 2024
#36
Those who fail to correct their mistakes lose credibility. Honest mistakes become lies when they
Mousetoescamper
Sep 2024
#9
You're welcome! It just saves so much time (and credibility) to check first.
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#12
Yes. Probably a difference in formats. It happens on my PC. There are many pages,
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#56
Probably in the basis of "interfering with forum moderation." BUT, as noted, there have been calls for help...
Hekate
Sep 2024
#38
Another possibility is the "negatively call-out" part of "No personal attacks or flaming" rule
progree
Sep 2024
#42
I was correcting misinformation in a post that was getting a lot of recs and replies from people who
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#55
Creating an OP to point to an errant post in another thread might be considered a callout by some people
progree
Sep 2024
#72
I don't like that outcome either. I don't know how the appeal will go - the forum moderation interference
progree
Sep 2024
#75
I don't see how it's interfering with forum moderation if I point put misinformation in a post. I've been trying
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#53
I'm on your side and completely agree with you. The query was from someone who seemed...
Hekate
Sep 2024
#59
Maybe there needs to be another option when you alert..something like "post is untrue"
likesmountains 52
Sep 2024
#43
Here's a link to the Community Help thread from 7/30 about adding an untrue information category
ms liberty
Sep 2024
#21
Thanks for that link! I didn't see a recent post from you kicking it, so I'm guessing there was a glitch or you
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#40
Thank you for the correction. I rely so much on DU to not only supply facts, but to correct misinformation.
chia
Sep 2024
#33
Thank you! And almost all posts have a little blue box with a twitter link. nt
cliffside
Sep 2024
#48
Well, as Jane Goodall said, "In war, the truth is so precious it much be protected by a bodyguard of lies"
Bucky
Sep 2024
#54
I'm with you. As you previously pointed out, the flood of drivel was burying
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#62
That's the only possibility. MIRT's jurisdiction is for people with post counts less than 100, and forum hosts
progree
Sep 2024
#73
It is becoming apparent that we need a "factually false post" category of Alert.
LudwigPastorius
Sep 2024
#63