Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

billcomp1

(10 posts)
44. Yes, he will need to clean up after this
Tue Sep 24, 2024, 05:09 PM
Sep 2024

Tonight, there will be some gnashing of teeth by Mr. T., as he rages against this.
However, I don't see how he can fight this one.
When this comes out - it comes out....and my understanding is there are some sordid details about it that could not be brought up before.

As far as his people crying about the election, to my way of thinking, he has had more delays than any normal citizen would get.
There would simply be no way for an average citizen to continue to pay for expensive lawyers to try to run out the clock.

At some point, the clock wins. At some point, there is justice.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R Clouds Passing Sep 2024 #1
YES!!! hlthe2b Sep 2024 #2
If Chutkin considered what would be "unfair politically"... Think. Again. Sep 2024 #3
Judge Chutkan didn't make a promise to Magats gab13by13 Sep 2024 #7
Well said. Think. Again. Sep 2024 #8
This is a BFD gab13by13 Sep 2024 #4
I don't think he can appeal...since SCOTUS ruled on his appeal and kicked it back to her to make further rulings PortTack Sep 2024 #28
Trump got what he wanted BOSSHOG Sep 2024 #43
You Can Be Absolutely Sure... GB_RN Sep 2024 #45
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 UpInArms Sep 2024 #5
This will leave a mark on the felon. republianmushroom Sep 2024 #6
Or on the felon's pants. N/T BobsYourUncle Sep 2024 #37
Yes, he will need to clean up after this billcomp1 Sep 2024 #44
This was the minimum we needed ScratchCat Sep 2024 #9
This will piss off TFG LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2024 #10
And it's a WOMAN in charge! BattleRow Sep 2024 #26
Or "jewels," as you indicated. Bumbles Sep 2024 #40
AND...like me, She's a BLACK WOMAN!!!!! How much does this chap his stinky diaper clad PRODIGIOUS ass that he's The_REAL_Ecumenist Sep 2024 #41
Seems the only real men these days ARE BattleRow Sep 2024 #46
I like your attitude. usonian Sep 2024 #60
Clever Usonian. Wish I'd said that. jaxexpat Sep 2024 #64
If I post on DU, other than my photos, feel free to steal and share. usonian Sep 2024 #66
Kick dalton99a Sep 2024 #11
When epreic01 Sep 2024 #12
Don't know, but Smih's deadline is this Thursday at 5 PM Eastern servermsh Sep 2024 #22
Darn I was hoping all they had to do is hit send. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2024 #53
Chutkan should be running the doj - she unflinchingly puts justice first. polichick Sep 2024 #13
What choice did she have? SCOTUS told her to get on this and separate charges /nt bucolic_frolic Sep 2024 #14
"CHUTKAN: "[A]llowing a brief from the Government is not 'contrary to law procedure, and custom,' as Defendant claims," Cha Sep 2024 #15
Freepers--it's a big WIN for Trump! Kingofalldems Sep 2024 #16
Of course! PortTack Sep 2024 #29
I laughed at your last line...whether you meant to or not ..."this will be HUGH!" Go Hugh... Comfortably_Numb Sep 2024 #34
JFK Jr will read the exonerating evidence on the courthouse steps.... rubbersole Sep 2024 #36
...wearing a dark blue suit and a long red tie.* ShazzieB Sep 2024 #48
And Series! COL Mustard Sep 2024 #47
Put the gist of it on kairos12 Sep 2024 #17
Beautiful! H2O Man Sep 2024 #18
Do go on, Judge Chutkan! Do go on! dchill Sep 2024 #19
"A lengthy brief" might just become my favorite oxymoron. Harker Sep 2024 #20
the scrotus six DemonGoddess Sep 2024 #21
the law is strong with this 1.( in the voice of james earl jones , rip. silent key) AllaN01Bear Sep 2024 #25
"" AllaN01Bear Sep 2024 #23
Straight to the Supreme Court bpj62 Sep 2024 #24
See post #15... I think SCROTUS ruled and this is the end result. PortTack Sep 2024 #30
No it is NOT the end result. The SCOTUS made it ambiguous. After Judge Chutkan rules Trump can appeal again Jmb 4 Harris-Walz Sep 2024 #54
Get on with it. Start with circulating the info. oasis Sep 2024 #27
Great news, now how much will be sealed? Bev54 Sep 2024 #31
I'm not sure why "granted" is in quotes. Judges grant or deny motions -- in whole or in part. rsdsharp Sep 2024 #32
IKR? I too was confused by that quote business. progressoid Sep 2024 #35
Woohoo! iluvtennis Sep 2024 #33
October surprise! Deminpenn Sep 2024 #38
kick and recommend samsingh Sep 2024 #39
When will the filing be made publicly accessible? misanthrope Sep 2024 #42
Glenn K, from yesterday, about what the redaction means... RobertDevereaux Sep 2024 #49
There's going to be an 'exhibit appendix' 😀 crickets Sep 2024 #50
Exactly! RobertDevereaux Sep 2024 #55
And here is Glenn's short, pointed followup. RobertDevereaux Sep 2024 #59
How do I file a FOIA request? usonian Sep 2024 #51
How do I make a FOIA Request? JoseBalow Sep 2024 #56
Thanks!! usonian Sep 2024 #57
No problemo JoseBalow Sep 2024 #58
I'm curious as to what your 'friend' wants to request via FOIA onenote Sep 2024 #65
Nothing goes unredacted, but hopefully either enough dirt in the nature of things or easy to guess black bars. usonian Sep 2024 #67
This opinion was a fun read LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2024 #52
When evidence is made public, the jury will decide on Nov 5. usonian Sep 2024 #61
K&R UTUSN Sep 2024 #62
OK Jack Smith... ReRe Sep 2024 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Chutkan has *grante...»Reply #44