Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

applegrove

(131,752 posts)
Wed Sep 25, 2024, 04:07 PM Sep 2024

"The evidence will be powerful": Legal experts say Jack Smith about to drop a bomb in Trump case [View all]

"The evidence will be powerful": Legal experts say Jack Smith about to drop a bomb in Trump case

Legal scholars expect a bitter fight over what evidence may be redacted from the public
By RUSSELL PAYNE
Staff Reporter
PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 1:32PM (EDT)

https://www.salon.com/2024/09/25/the-evidence-will-be-powerful-legal-experts-say-jack-smith-about-to-drop-a-bomb-in-case/

"SNIP............

Special counsel Jack Smith is expected to submit an “oversized” brief in former President Donald Trump’s election interference case in Washington D.C. by Thursday. The briefing is, in the view of the judge overseeing the case, needed to respond to the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling.

Smith requested permission to exceed the normal length limits for briefs, seeking to file up to 200 pages of argumentation in the case, which immediately drew comparisons to past special counsel reports, like those from special counsels Robert Mueller or Robert Hur. This comes as a response to the Supreme Court’s ruling earlier this year, which found the president enjoys broad legal immunity for official “core constitutional acts.”

The Supreme Court ruling threw the prosecution of Trump for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election into chaos and the new filing is an opportunity for Smith to make the case that Trump’s efforts do not qualify as official acts.

Attorney Ty Cobb, a former Trump White House lawyer, told Salon that the filing from Smith was appropriate and necessary in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling but he said that the filing likely won’t be like special counsel reports.

............SNIP"

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I thought that when a law was passed... 1WorldHope Sep 2024 #1
What law are you referring to? Fiendish Thingy Sep 2024 #4
It's not a law. It's an interpretation of the meaning of the Constitution. In this case it states that presidents enjoy Martin68 Sep 2024 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author 1WorldHope Sep 2024 #16
TY Grateful for Jack Smith.... We Cha Sep 2024 #2
Folks shouldn't expect the details of the report to be available publicly right away Fiendish Thingy Sep 2024 #3
Soon, please Hekate Sep 2024 #5
I've been tricked by filing hype before BaronChocula Sep 2024 #6
You're soon to be flushed, smelly, stinking Turd-Traitor! Tarzanrock Sep 2024 #7
Any minute now, maxsolomon Sep 2024 #8
Smith will submit 2 briefs Butterflylady Sep 2024 #9
Release a friggin' honking steaming stinking Kracken, Jack BoRaGard Sep 2024 #10
Wake me orangecrush Sep 2024 #11
...a little something to stimulate your imagination BoRaGard Sep 2024 #12
SCoTUS fabricated "core" out of whole cloth bucolic_frolic Sep 2024 #13
ALSO "official acts," which it used to justify anything that's otherwise subject to criminal law. ancianita Sep 2024 #15
For the life of me I just don't understand why he Botany Sep 2024 #17
Too bad we won't know how bad it is Rob H. Sep 2024 #18
Cobbs' opinion is worthless to me. NoMoreRepugs Sep 2024 #19
Hopefully it has enough impact to be an October surprise dsp3000 Sep 2024 #20
Halloween surprise might be in Ivana's coffin. tavernier Sep 2024 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The evidence will be pow...