Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,665 posts)

16. If Kock was truly in it for the "good"

Sun Dec 9, 2012, 03:56 PM

Dec 2012

he would have politely declined having it named for him.

Sorry, no quarter.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When the 1% do GOOD things with their $$$ [View all] Bicoastal Dec 2012 OP

That's SUCH bullshit. Bicoastal Dec 2012 #7

hmm. MrYikes Dec 2012 #5

I see the point you're trying to make.... Bicoastal Dec 2012 #8

Philanthropy is often handmade34 Dec 2012 #6

I hear what you're saying... OneGrassRoot Dec 2012 #9

They are also buying a few additional items TomClash Dec 2012 #10

The Kochs fund PBS... lame54 Dec 2012 #11

Philanthropy from the 1% is a band-aid on the bullet wound of inequality Taitertots Dec 2012 #12

People... 99Forever Dec 2012 #13

Well, I'm different from many here... Bicoastal Dec 2012 #14

What a load of Drew Richards Dec 2012 #15

If Kock was truly in it for the "good" Ruby the Liberal Dec 2012 #16