Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Garland won't secure the ballot boxes Biden MUST! The burnings are escalating [View all]Scrivener7
(59,441 posts)2. Those fuckers. Empty those things out now, and every hour from now to election day.
Because Garland's not going to do a damn thing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
175 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Garland won't secure the ballot boxes Biden MUST! The burnings are escalating [View all]
Iwasthere
Oct 2024
OP
Those fuckers. Empty those things out now, and every hour from now to election day.
Scrivener7
Oct 2024
#2
Yes, I'm afraid this is only going to get worse and more widespread as we get closer to the election
Farmgirl1961
Oct 2024
#4
Pretty sure you don't understand the equal protection clause and how and when it is applied.
onenote
Oct 2024
#76
I'd love to hear your explanation of how the equal protection clause is violated by the destruction of a ballot box?
onenote
Oct 2024
#96
No? You've repeatedly cited the equal protection clause as the basis for federal intervention.
onenote
Oct 2024
#167
So write to DoJ and tell them to get their asses to Portland to guard ballot dropboxes.
Ocelot II
Oct 2024
#87
It's not a matter of opposition at all. It's just that your understanding of the extent
Ocelot II
Oct 2024
#95
Yes, it's up to the states. They, and only they, have the number of personnel necessary
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2024
#98
There's plenty you can do. You can demand your state guards ballot boxes
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2024
#127
The boxes should be indoors, collected every day, have observers present, &
bucolic_frolic
Oct 2024
#24
Indoor boxes do make sense, but isn't that decision up to local election officials?
sarisataka
Oct 2024
#27
When GOP officials tried to do that, we rightfully called it voter suppression.
BlueCheeseAgain
Oct 2024
#38
It's sometimes an option in riots and looting. Not often used in the US.
bucolic_frolic
Oct 2024
#47
Yes, he's the only person on the planet not accountable to any U.S. law...
Think. Again.
Oct 2024
#121
Overturning the election would "faithfully execute the office of President."
sarisataka
Oct 2024
#138
Yes, but simply claiming candidates are disqualified doesn't break any written laws...
Think. Again.
Oct 2024
#140
I have been trying to point out how dangerous this ruling is since it came down...
Think. Again.
Oct 2024
#174
The deterence and prosecution of federal crimes such as election interference...
Think. Again.
Oct 2024
#117
What do people think Garland or Biden could do about state controlled ballot boxes????????????????? nt
LAS14
Oct 2024
#43
For everyone here to get a clear picture of what federal and state LE are doing about this.
Eko
Oct 2024
#54
If it was plasteted on every outlet of a $250,000 fine and a potentional 10 year jail stint
Iwasthere
Oct 2024
#136
Rememeber when we called it "election interference" when some states enacted laws that ballot boxes had to be
Silent Type
Oct 2024
#105
Ballot boxes are more secure than blue mail boxes. I think this kind of terrorism will get worse, so ballot boxes
Silent Type
Oct 2024
#119
IMO the Governors in each state should develop a plan to guard the ballot boxes... there are several ways this could be
Jmb 4 Harris-Walz
Oct 2024
#145
There are a limited number of magats that could be expected to do these things...
Think. Again.
Oct 2024
#175