to verify the machines accuracy. 1) this is performed by actual election officials with the duty, responsibility and authority to perform such tasks (and, fortunately for all of us, as well as election integrity - not the Sally Sidelines and Steven Spoonamores of the blogosphere and 2) it is neither necessary nor productive to 'hand count' an entire state - we'll say PA - in order to 'verify' results. It isn't required - it doesn't prove anything - it is a massive, and massively expensive undertaking - and it serves to further illustrate that the Sally Sidelines out there really don't understand the subject or know what they are talking about.
And finally, you are also incorrect in your assertion that there is "no other way to debunk" Spoonamore's claims. In fact Snope just did so - by pointing to faulty figures, faulty math, and faulty logic and assumption. That is quite sufficient to 'debunk' Mr Spoonamore - and the basis of his argument.
Self-described tech executive and network engineer Stephen Spoonamore asserted in a letter to U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris his "near certainty" that she, not President-elect Donald Trump, won the 2024 presidential election.
Spoonamore described a hacking and fraud scheme whereby fake "bullet vote" ballots marked only for Trump and no other races or issues were inserted into electronic voting systems.
However, Snopes' research, in which we compared the vote tallies cited by Spoonamore with the latest official election results, found his figures to be incorrect and his assertions to make no mathematical sense.
= new reply since forum marked as read