Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]Oneironaut
(6,284 posts)23. I understand that viewpoint and don't think it conflicts with trans people.
The free ability to shed gender roles and trans people existing are not mutually exclusive.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're not going to get an honest discussion about trans issues from Helen Lewis.
WhiskeyGrinder
Dec 2024
#2
I get what you are saying. But also women have long history of attempting to shed gender roles.
boston bean
Dec 2024
#17
That is understood. But I think sometimes is looked upon as an attack, when it is not.
boston bean
Dec 2024
#34
Approximately 1% of the US population identify as transgender (from a google search) - somehow that 1% becomes of vast
NoMoreRepugs
Dec 2024
#6
Ah, that was the "Harris is for they/them" ad. It ran absolutely everywhere in the country for weeks.
bearsfootball516
Dec 2024
#31
I thought voters would recognize that Trump also supported gender affirming care for inmates using taxpayer dollars
Shambala
Dec 2024
#56
In my swing state (still mostly red), the ad where Charlemagne said "Hell no I don't want my tax money going
Silent Type
Dec 2024
#7
Kark Rove made his career out of turning an opponent's strength into a weakness
dalton99a
Dec 2024
#8
This is a subject so rife with misunderstandings (intentional and less so) that only the most adamant
hlthe2b
Dec 2024
#11
I had to laugh even though it is not funny. Honestly, I only wish this was news to me.
hlthe2b
Dec 2024
#41
Don't really care about ignorant Republicans who have no knowledge or understanding of the issue
Quiet Em
Dec 2024
#25
Bullshit. Democrats need learn to focus Americans' attention on the things that actually
Scrivener7
Dec 2024
#15
You are so right. The Republicans ran with a rapist and convicted felon for president who was awaiting trial
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2024
#26
It also shows, and I take heat for saying this but it's obvious, that Democrats need
Scrivener7
Dec 2024
#30
It is not "inferred rather strongly," it is explicitly against the rules of the forum.
Ms. Toad
Dec 2024
#59
You cannot advocate to restrict the rights of trans individuals on a progressive/left political forum,
Ms. Toad
Dec 2024
#68
If you don't understand why discrimination is wrong I'm not sure what to say
AZSkiffyGeek
Dec 2024
#73
"I have never met a single person who thinks individuals born as males should be playing female sports"
LAS14
Dec 2024
#80
Also, explaining it requires more than 15 seconds of effort/thought and the desire to learn on the part of the person
meadowlander
Dec 2024
#78
OP, thank you for having the courage to raise this topic in such a thoughtful manner...
PeaceWave
Dec 2024
#75