Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Fiendish Thingy

(23,192 posts)

1. Does it meet the criteria?

Reply to TheProle (Original post)

Thu Dec 5, 2024, 12:57 PM

Dec 2024

It seems the murder was intended to use coercion or intimidation to influence corporate , not government policy.

If a suspect is apprehended, I’m not sure they could be charged with anything but murder.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Passages Attilatheblond TrunKated

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CEO Killer: Domestic Terrorist [View all] TheProle Dec 2024 OP

Does it meet the criteria? Fiendish Thingy Dec 2024 #1

Fair points, TheProle Dec 2024 #2

I think Fiendy is correct. nt yagotme Dec 2024 #4

If he shot the CEO because of UHC's policies, it was in retaliation for Ocelot II Dec 2024 #3

I agree. If that was the shooter's motive, it was an assassination. yardwork Dec 2024 #7

The Oligarch run state will ALWAYS declare an attack on them is an attack on 'the State' Attilatheblond Dec 2024 #16

Wealthy corporations making billions fleecing and killing Americans are not the US government. Irish_Dem Dec 2024 #5

And they do it legally.... Happy Hoosier Dec 2024 #11

Yes the US has made it legal to kill and torment Americans in many different ways. Irish_Dem Dec 2024 #13

That's the theroy anyway Attilatheblond Dec 2024 #20

So as usual special consideration for the wealthiest people. mucifer Dec 2024 #6

It's not special consideration. Attacking *anyone* for commercial behavior Ocelot II Dec 2024 #9

Yep Attilatheblond Dec 2024 #21

Nope. Kingofalldems Dec 2024 #8

THAT is terrorism Attilatheblond Dec 2024 #22

Ignorant question GusBob Dec 2024 #10

While it definitely seems like revenge TheProle Dec 2024 #12

At the moment no, sarisataka Dec 2024 #14

LOL n/t leftstreet Dec 2024 #15

Still laughing out loud? TheProle Dec 2024 #24

They've got to label the shooter a terrorist. k55f5r Dec 2024 #17

Post removed Post removed Dec 2024 #18

Corporations are the State and have been for awhile. I wouldn't be surprised if this is classified as a terrorist act. jalan48 Dec 2024 #19

Or domestic enemy as stated in the oath of office. And the orange one still walks free. nt Hotler Dec 2024 #23