Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

liberaltalkingpoints

(23 posts)

2. agree

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Sat Jan 21, 2012, 08:01 PM

Jan 2012

I agree with this sentiment currently but it remains to be seen how effective the super pac ads are going to be going forward. The electorate appears to be on to the use of the super pac anonymity and sheer volume of cash at this time. If this state of affairs continues for a few more election cycles, I believe the super pacs will start to hit their stride and become far more effective.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Steve Schmidt hit the nail on the head. [View all] RandySF Jan 2012 OP

true, but if the candidate has no money, the media narrative is that the candidate can't win virtualobserver Jan 2012 #1

agree liberaltalkingpoints Jan 2012 #2

Last time they kept saying how historic it was about Obama marlakay Jan 2012 #3