Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,254 posts)
16. My take: the analysis makes no sense
Tue Dec 31, 2024, 06:58 PM
Dec 2024

Popok's theory seems to be that Smith stepped aside in order to put pressure on the 11th Circuit to act on the appeal of Cannon's ruling on the constitutionality of the special counsel appointment. Apparently, he also believes that Trump will be deterred from firing the US attorney who now is in charge of the case,

But it's the height of naïveté to think Trump would hesitate to ask the US attorney to resign or hesitate to fire him. Indeed, if keeping the case going was the strategy, Smith would have stayed on, since firing him is more difficult than firing a US attorney -- although Bondi would do so in an instant if Trump tells her too. Finally, in all likelihood, the 11th Circuit would be more than happy to have the case go away, especially with Smith shutting down his office, which means even if the case moved forward under the direction of the US attorney, a reversal of Cannon wouldn't
revive the Special Counsel office.

Smith stepped aside because he wants to be gone before Trump tries to fire him. He knows that Trump can and will derail the case against Nauta and de Oliveira -- or Trump will pardon them, mooting the case.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So Trump will close it? Captain Zero Dec 2024 #1
Added the video that lays it out. UTUSN Dec 2024 #3
What makes him look worse than being a child rapist? onecaliberal Dec 2024 #9
Meidas is ridiculous Bluetus Dec 2024 #12
The criminals in that state are child rape lovers. onecaliberal Dec 2024 #2
This is the appeal re CANON's ruling Special Counsel "unconstitutional" - not the docs per se. UTUSN Dec 2024 #4
In what universe is this a "bombshell" or even unexpected? onenote Dec 2024 #5
Whew, am glad I'm not who used "bombshell" or would have my feelings hurt. UTUSN Dec 2024 #7
What's the point? Bluetus Dec 2024 #17
I don't know if theres' truth to what you are saying but my impression of Jack Smith is he moved lightnening fast after MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #19
Of course, Garland was the main person who slow-walked this Bluetus Jan 2025 #23
Doubt it's going anywhere unless someone has evidence of trump selling documents directly or giving them away. Silent Type Dec 2024 #6
Again, this is not the Docs part. Might have to Delete thread & re-post for a fresh start. UTUSN Dec 2024 #8
I htought the Cannon case was about the docs MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #20
I pray every day for that to happen MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #21
20 left days for report , Jack. republianmushroom Dec 2024 #10
At first glance I thought "Florida Atty's Office" meant Bondi. Marcuse Dec 2024 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author ShazzieB Dec 2024 #13
I just watched the video, and I highly recommend it. ShazzieB Dec 2024 #14
Thanks for the thoughtfully constructive post. UTUSN Dec 2024 #15
My take: the analysis makes no sense onenote Dec 2024 #16
Actually, i appreciated your previous post for amounting to a precis of most of what POPOK covered. UTUSN Dec 2024 #18
I'm still looking for the report/link you are referring to MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jack SMITH transfers docs...»Reply #16