Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,312 posts)
17. It's a shocking, shocking thing.
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 12:17 PM
Jan 2025

I mean, this is absolutely the first time Trump reversed himself and the rank hypocrisy must be pointed out.

Except that when Trump speaks it's without regard to either the truth or what he said before. It's been that way for years and it's likely to be that way until he's uttered his last syllable.

Then again, 4.5 years is long enough time to reverse one's opinion. He wouldn't be the first politician to do that.

(But really, the reason for his proposed ban was that it was benefitting Biden-Harris and not him in the run up to the election. The reason for his defense of it now is the reverse--he perceives it as having benefitted him more than Harris-Walz during the most recent campaign.)

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's a ruse. CousinIT Jan 2025 #1
The shitbag never do anything that he can't profit from. Dave Bowman Jan 2025 #2
They shut it down so trmp could open it & be a 'hero'. Biden said he wasn't going to enforce it. spanone Jan 2025 #29
I don't see how. Doesn't TT have to prove that there is a legitimate buyer lined up? OrlandoDem2 Jan 2025 #3
You are talking about TSF following the law edhopper Jan 2025 #4
Oops...wrong place. A HERETIC I AM Jan 2025 #25
Our National Security is of no concern to him. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #5
The national security line is just nonsense. Total bullshit. A HERETIC I AM Jan 2025 #26
Perhaps, but the reason a bipartisan Congress gave to ban tiktok .... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #33
The operative word is "gave" A HERETIC I AM Jan 2025 #34
Wasn't he the one who wanted it banned? Dem4life1234 Jan 2025 #6
Yes. dalton99a Jan 2025 #8
Thank you Dem4life1234 Jan 2025 #9
You HAVE to make this an OP! Please? Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #11
Tiktok's position, actions and statements ForgedCrank Jan 2025 #7
Please, friends! Bookmark this thread and, whenever you see someone saying the felon saved tiktok, Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #10
Thank you! Dem4life1234 Jan 2025 #14
The 🍊💩🤡's Lokee11 Jan 2025 #21
Well Dem4life1234 Jan 2025 #22
It's a shocking, shocking thing. Igel Jan 2025 #17
Completely wrong Wiz Imp Jan 2025 #31
Who instituted the ban? Biden said he wouldn't. spanone Jan 2025 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author spanone Jan 2025 #13
I don't think that helps Arazi Jan 2025 #15
Good! Do not give Trump a win!! OrlandoDem2 Jan 2025 #16
Biden "said" is very different than Biden signing an "EO" LeftInTX Jan 2025 #19
How could we live without NameAlreadyTaken Jan 2025 #18
He has a sycophant lined up to get it Blue Full Moon Jan 2025 #20
I'm not sure what your link to a 4+ year old article has to do with your comment. Wiz Imp Jan 2025 #32
He's issuing over 100 Tickle Jan 2025 #23
He'll be grinding out exec. orders like sausages. Easier to do than working with other allegorical oracle Jan 2025 #24
Trump signs nothing unless there is personal gain for him. Irish_Dem Jan 2025 #27
DUers, do you think if we could find a way for him to profit, he'd ban military weapons for civilians? Deuxcents Jan 2025 #28
Incorrect. Wiz Imp Jan 2025 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The felon is issuing an e...»Reply #17