Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: in talking with my daughter and her friends, i cannot think of one thing that has alienated young dem voters more [View all]snot
(11,900 posts)143. "Genocide" does not require gas chambers.
"Now, an 'objective, methodological, and detailed analysis' conducted in part by the Boston University School of Laws International Human Rights Clinic as part of a report from the University Network for Human Rights (UNHR), a consortium of human rights centers at colleges across the world, has released its finding.
"The UNHR report, released in mid-May, concludes: 'Israel has committed genocidal acts, namely killing, seriously harming, and inflicting conditions of life calculated, and intended to, bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza,' says Susan Akram, a LAW clinical professor of law and director of LAWs International Human Rights Clinic, who contributed to the report.
"The report was researched and written by UNHR members from LAWs International Human Rights Clinic, the International Human Rights Clinic at Cornell Law School, the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria in South Africa, and the Lowenstein Human Rights Project at Yale Law School.
The reports conclusions are based on internationally agreed upon definitions of genocide. 'As set forth in the Genocide Convention of 1948, the report reads, the crime of genocide requires that a perpetrator kill, seriously harm, or inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of a group, in whole or in part, with the intent to destroy the group as such.' The report continues: 'after reviewing the facts established by independent human rights monitors, journalists, and United Nations agencies, we conclude that Israels actions in and regarding Gaza since October 7, 2023, violate the Genocide Convention.'
"The UNHR report, released in mid-May, concludes: 'Israel has committed genocidal acts, namely killing, seriously harming, and inflicting conditions of life calculated, and intended to, bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza,' says Susan Akram, a LAW clinical professor of law and director of LAWs International Human Rights Clinic, who contributed to the report.
"The report was researched and written by UNHR members from LAWs International Human Rights Clinic, the International Human Rights Clinic at Cornell Law School, the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria in South Africa, and the Lowenstein Human Rights Project at Yale Law School.
The reports conclusions are based on internationally agreed upon definitions of genocide. 'As set forth in the Genocide Convention of 1948, the report reads, the crime of genocide requires that a perpetrator kill, seriously harm, or inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of a group, in whole or in part, with the intent to destroy the group as such.' The report continues: 'after reviewing the facts established by independent human rights monitors, journalists, and United Nations agencies, we conclude that Israels actions in and regarding Gaza since October 7, 2023, violate the Genocide Convention.'
More at https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/ .
"According to a United Nations agency and a growing number of experts and rights organisations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, Israel has committed genocidal acts against the Palestinian people during its ongoing invasion and bombing of the Gaza Strip as part of the IsraelHamas war. Various observers, including the UN Special Committee to investigate Israeli practices and the United Nations Special Rapporteur, have cited statements by senior Israeli officials that may indicate an 'intent to destroy' Gaza's population in whole or in part, a necessary condition for the legal threshold of genocide to be met.
"By mid-August 2024, it was confirmed that the Israeli military's actions had caused the deaths of at least 40,000 people in the Gaza Strip1 out of every 59 peopleaveraging 148 deaths per day. Most of the victims are civilians, of whom at least 50% are women and children. Compared to other recent global conflicts, the numbers of known deaths of journalists, humanitarian and health workers, and children are among the highest. Thousands of more dead bodies are thought to be under the rubble of destroyed buildings. The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries. The number of injured is greater than 100,000; Gaza has the most child amputees per capita in the world. As of August 2024, only 17 of Gaza's 36 hospitals were partially functional; 84% of its health centers have been destroyed or suffered damage. An enforced Israeli blockade heavily contributed to starvation and the threat of famine in Gaza, while some Israeli civilians have blocked or attacked aid convoys delivering humanitarian supplies across the border. Early in the conflict, Israel cut off Gaza's water and electricity supply. Israel has also destroyed numerous culturally significant buildings, such as all of Gaza's 12 universities, 80% of its schools, and numerous mosques, churches, museums, and libraries.
"The government of South Africa has instituted proceedings, South Africa v. Israel, against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), alleging a violation of the Genocide Convention. In an initial ruling, the ICJ held that South Africa was entitled to bring its case against Israel, while Palestinians were recognised to have a right to protection from genocide. The court ordered Israel to observe its obligations under the Genocide Convention by taking all measures within its power to prevent the commission of acts of genocide, to prevent and punish incitement to genocide, and to allow basic humanitarian services into Gaza. The court also later ordered Israel to increase humanitarian aid into Gaza and to prevent genocidal acts during the Rafah offensive. The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations."
"By mid-August 2024, it was confirmed that the Israeli military's actions had caused the deaths of at least 40,000 people in the Gaza Strip1 out of every 59 peopleaveraging 148 deaths per day. Most of the victims are civilians, of whom at least 50% are women and children. Compared to other recent global conflicts, the numbers of known deaths of journalists, humanitarian and health workers, and children are among the highest. Thousands of more dead bodies are thought to be under the rubble of destroyed buildings. The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries. The number of injured is greater than 100,000; Gaza has the most child amputees per capita in the world. As of August 2024, only 17 of Gaza's 36 hospitals were partially functional; 84% of its health centers have been destroyed or suffered damage. An enforced Israeli blockade heavily contributed to starvation and the threat of famine in Gaza, while some Israeli civilians have blocked or attacked aid convoys delivering humanitarian supplies across the border. Early in the conflict, Israel cut off Gaza's water and electricity supply. Israel has also destroyed numerous culturally significant buildings, such as all of Gaza's 12 universities, 80% of its schools, and numerous mosques, churches, museums, and libraries.
"The government of South Africa has instituted proceedings, South Africa v. Israel, against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), alleging a violation of the Genocide Convention. In an initial ruling, the ICJ held that South Africa was entitled to bring its case against Israel, while Palestinians were recognised to have a right to protection from genocide. The court ordered Israel to observe its obligations under the Genocide Convention by taking all measures within its power to prevent the commission of acts of genocide, to prevent and punish incitement to genocide, and to allow basic humanitarian services into Gaza. The court also later ordered Israel to increase humanitarian aid into Gaza and to prevent genocidal acts during the Rafah offensive. The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations."
{Footnotes omittied.} More at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocide
"On 5 December [2024], Amnesty International concluded after an investigation that 'Israel has committed and is continuing to commit genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip'. A few days later, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) stated that after research and analysis, it concluded that 'there is a legally sound argument that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza'.
"A few days after that, Human Rights Watch (HRW) declared that 'Israeli authorities are responsible for the crime against humanity of extermination and for acts of genocide', and Médecins Sans Frontières reported that its medical 'teams in the north of Gaza are seeing clear signs of ethnic cleansing'. Earlier in November, HRW also concluded that Israels actions in Gaza amounted to 'war crimes' and 'crimes against humanity', and appeared to 'also meet the definition of ethnic cleansing'."
"A few days after that, Human Rights Watch (HRW) declared that 'Israeli authorities are responsible for the crime against humanity of extermination and for acts of genocide', and Médecins Sans Frontières reported that its medical 'teams in the north of Gaza are seeing clear signs of ethnic cleansing'. Earlier in November, HRW also concluded that Israels actions in Gaza amounted to 'war crimes' and 'crimes against humanity', and appeared to 'also meet the definition of ethnic cleansing'."
More at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/dec/23/israel-gaza-war-genocide-where-is-the-action .
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
180 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
in talking with my daughter and her friends, i cannot think of one thing that has alienated young dem voters more [View all]
AmandaRuth
Jan 2025
OP
The ban will be in effect for roughly the final 36 hours of his presidency. Why give Trump an easy win?
LonePirate
Jan 2025
#112
And this is the ATTITUDE towards the concerns of others, which helped give us Trump again.
Jack Valentino
Jan 2025
#157
No. It actually wasn't. It was a major issue among younger voters in NoCal. Not the only thing.
msfiddlestix
Jan 2025
#46
This below caused the first really negative blowback from my real-life social set. Climate change is a huge issue for us
Celerity
Jan 2025
#41
That happened in late 2021, 3 years before the next POTUS election. Then, in March 2023, the Willow Project approval did
Celerity
Jan 2025
#47
yes, i've heard a lot of anti R stuff, but in thier minds, this puts them in the same bucket
AmandaRuth
Jan 2025
#11
I can. If they are adults then they are responsible to know what's going on.
travelingthrulife
Jan 2025
#173
I have a hard time understanding how anyone could be so addicted to a social media site they would
sop
Jan 2025
#55
I would understand if a candidate wanted to take away their healthcare, social security and medicare.
sop
Jan 2025
#162
He signed the ban into into law, so he'll likely get the most blame (fair or not)
Polybius
Jan 2025
#101
drumpf is going to sell it to whoever offers him the largest bribe. there will not be a ban
Takket
Jan 2025
#9
they care very much, just vocal about a service where these issues are actually talked about
AmandaRuth
Jan 2025
#29
They do realize there are other sites and forums where they can talk about these things, right?
RandomNumbers
Jan 2025
#68
This is false but whatever message China has amplified should've been countered
uponit7771
Jan 2025
#62
And now I know why the head of TikTok will be in the front row at the inauguration.
hedda_foil
Jan 2025
#26
I'm afraid so. I just came across this piece, which adds support to my supposition.
hedda_foil
Jan 2025
#56
Sounds like trump is seriously considering a 90-day delay of ban. If people are stuck on TTock, trump will gain points
Silent Type
Jan 2025
#27
My bet is Trump didn't want every TT teenager pissed at him. So now he can blame it on Biden,
Silent Type
Jan 2025
#91
Trump Signs Executive Order That Will Effectively Ban Use Of TikTok In the U.S.
spanone
Jan 2025
#37
I remember when the Internet came along everyone said it would make people smarter.
Vinca
Jan 2025
#54
Maybe worrying about a dictator/oligarch rapist and a cabinet of dangerous creeps should be a higher priority.
chowder66
Jan 2025
#60
"came to the party for Obama and Bernie, and did not vote the last election."
CousinIT
Jan 2025
#105
something like the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) would be ideal
DBoon
Jan 2025
#108
TRUMP banned Tik-Tok in 2020 via an executive order. It was never implemented due to a court injunction
Wiz Imp
Jan 2025
#113
Never would have guessed that democracy would rise or fall over freakin' TikTok.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
Jan 2025
#124
"Alienated," are we? Taught mean old establishment Daddy Biden a lesson by not voting, did we?
betsuni
Jan 2025
#125
I think it best if easily alienated do not vote. We do not need more Jill Stein voters
delisen
Jan 2025
#129
World on fire, and they're worried about a social media app on their phones . . .
hatrack
Jan 2025
#137
"All of a sudden 2.5 months later the TikTok ban is why Harris lost"? Yes, it's BS.
betsuni
Jan 2025
#159
Don't your daughter and her friends understand that Tiktok is a tool of the Cummunist Chinese?
totodeinhere
Jan 2025
#152
What do you expect President Biden to do? The youngsters will learn soon enough that tiktok
akbacchus_BC
Jan 2025
#167
This just highlights how utterly ridiculous people can be when they are single issue drones.
travelingthrulife
Jan 2025
#172