Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Oopsie Daisy

(6,670 posts)
20. What?! Why are you insinuating that Chuck Schumer would be complicit in any of those things?
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 03:10 PM
Jan 2025

What?! Are you insinuating that Chuck Schumer would be complicit in any of those things? Is it meant to be a warning because someone believes that he might be willing to sacrifice his principles?

Please, tell me... what good purpose is being served for anyone insinuates such things? Does anyone truly believe that Schumer wants to privatize Medicare; subvert the constitution; build a wall; persecute Muslims; line Trump's pockets; destroy the environment; sell National parks; eliminate the minimum wage; slash education funding; violate the Geneva Convention, etc etc etc.

It doesn't take a genius to realize how silly that sounds, does it? Better yet, I wonder if anyone realizes how insulting it is? Shitting on our party leaders like this and insinuating that Democrats are incompetent or complicit (or willing to be) does not help anything.

Actually it HURTS Democrats and suppresses the vote for Democrats.

Why would anyone do or say such things about party leadership? Does anyone honestly believe that Schumer does not support voter rights? Is there a genuinely held belief that he needs to be lectured about it, or that he needs to be "warned" and "dissuaded" from doing anything to suppress votes?

Does anyone truly think that Schumer is too crooked (or too gullible, or cowardly) that he would end up being complicit in eliminating the ACA and denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions?

>> He's been making work together noises.
What does this mean? Can you be more specific? Which of these things has Schumer indicated that he's flexible on? What has Schumer said or done that alarms you?

Or could it be, instead, that he's indicated a desire to find common ground and work together on things that everyone can agree on? Explain to me what's wrong or objectionable about anyone wanting to find common ground on ways to improve our nation's safety, health, welfare and happiness.

Schumer's willingness to "work with" Republicans tells me that he will continue to work for the things he values and believes in. What a shame it is that his words and intent is being twisted in mendacious ways just so that cheap pot-shots and backhanded insults can be hurled in his direction.

I think we can do better than needlessly smearing Democratic leadership with some sort of imagined fear that they are willing accomplices to the GOP treachery and evil. I think everyone should try to be better than that.

Attack Republicans, not Democrats. It's not too much to ask, is it?



Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks - I may want to use some of this rurallib Jan 2025 #1
Me too Karadeniz Jan 2025 #3
KNR and bookmarking. niyad Jan 2025 #2
I sent it in toto to my Congress critters dickthegrouch Jan 2025 #4
I just hope that the wicked witch doesn't intercept it! LT Barclay Jan 2025 #5
haha johnnyfins Jan 2025 #15
A master piece DENVERPOPS Jan 2025 #6
Wow! Post that everywhere you can. Joinfortmill Jan 2025 #7
Zuckerberg's working together for all that, though. tishaLA Jan 2025 #8
Send it to chuck schumer BonnieJW Jan 2025 #9
What?! Why are you insinuating that Chuck Schumer would be complicit in any of those things? Oopsie Daisy Jan 2025 #20
Yes, the ciricular firing squad needs to stop ASAP LymphocyteLover Jan 2025 #22
Schumer plays by the old political rules of bipartisanship and "smoke filled back room" debate progressoid Jan 2025 #26
Lovely. Another smear and slam of Schumer ... just charming. Oopsie Daisy Jan 2025 #27
Ageist? Never said anything about his age. Hell, he's younger than Drumpf. progressoid Jan 2025 #31
Yes, yes. Of course you never said anything directly. That's the nature of insinuations, isn't it? Oopsie Daisy Jan 2025 #32
OK, I'll bite... progressoid Jan 2025 #33
Attack Republicans, not Democrats. Oopsie Daisy Jan 2025 #34
Common-sense stuff. Uh huh. progressoid Jan 2025 #36
Do your part. Do not kneecap or sabotage our party or our party's candidates. Oopsie Daisy Jan 2025 #37
OK. I'll do my part. progressoid Jan 2025 #38
He's a frigging Senator.... stillcool Jan 2025 #28
Exactly bdamomma Jan 2025 #35
Co-signed! nt LittleGirl Jan 2025 #10
Can you post a link? Doesn't have to be the original, but. FB KPN Jan 2025 #11
I won't do that, since it came from a friend's post. Baitball Blogger Jan 2025 #13
They signed it & posted to FB. That's already Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2025 #14
Link doesn't work LymphocyteLover Jan 2025 #23
This one just did... Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2025 #40
And... littlemissmartypants Jan 2025 #25
This just worked... Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2025 #39
Gotcha! Thanks. KPN Jan 2025 #18
K&R with gusto meow2u3 Jan 2025 #12
how about good ole email and post for those who dont do meta. AllaN01Bear Jan 2025 #16
ding. this . AllaN01Bear Jan 2025 #17
Sign me up. Martin68 Jan 2025 #19
Yeah, my mom posted this and added her name LymphocyteLover Jan 2025 #21
Kick. Rec. Bkmrk. Hekate Jan 2025 #24
Fantastic! Love this list, and especially your last line... thank you! ancianita Jan 2025 #29
Awesome. Inspiring. Mike 03 Jan 2025 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's a little rebellio...»Reply #20