General Discussion

paleotn

(22,218 posts)

11. And how do you know they're not?

Reply to Scrivener7 (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 26, 2025, 07:54 PM

Jan 2025

And what other course would you recommend?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate GoCubsGo

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Some things to know about executive orders: [View all] Ocelot II Jan 2025 OP

And like so many things, Republicans previously were VERY opposed to Exec orders RandomNumbers Jan 2025 #1

So were (D) when Trump flurried the US with them in 2017. Igel Jan 2025 #10

"Governing by Executive Order" EllisWhy Jan 2025 #17

K & R malaise Jan 2025 #2

Ah! They're all working hard behind the scenes again! Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #3

No. First, it has been 6 days. Ms. Toad Jan 2025 #4

Gotta give team Felon credit, they have assured full employment of lawyers Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #42

That, they have. Ms. Toad Jan 2025 #55

That's how litigation works. Sorry you aren't getting news bulletins every day. Ocelot II Jan 2025 #5

There you go being all thoughtful and reasonable. TomSlick Jan 2025 #9

And how do you know they're not? paleotn Jan 2025 #11

Deja vu! I've been here before! Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #22

Interesting. You say you've been here before. But you can't offer any constructive alternatives. onenote Jan 2025 #23

And again, same song, different crisis. Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #25

Still repeating yourself. Still empty. onenote Jan 2025 #27

... orangecrush Jan 2025 #6

IOW, our side is preparing to. . . DinahMoeHum Jan 2025 #7

Worth bookmarking for future reference beyond the first days... Thank you. ancianita Jan 2025 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalArkie Jan 2025 #12

The Orange Hoover thinks that his "mandate" gives him absolute doctorial powers. Liberal In Texas Jan 2025 #13

Coincidentally... TommyT139 Jan 2025 #19

man. They can. twist anything to mean what they want it to mean MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #45

Thank you canetoad Jan 2025 #14

so lawyers will be our soldiers? 4catsmom Jan 2025 #15

And what is your better alternative? onenote Jan 2025 #24

Yes, I think so MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #46

My Donations ConstanceCee Jan 2025 #16

I don't JustAnotherGen Jan 2025 #18

Who's "they"? Ocelot II Jan 2025 #21

Not every Democratic lawyer is Merrick Garland MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #47

Thank you Ocelot, this is good, helpful info FakeNoose Jan 2025 #20

Hopefully our Dem reps will stop giving trump's actions... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #26

That's not going to happen. Rubio got the support of every Democrat. onenote Jan 2025 #28

We should continue shooting at all targets.... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #29

I meant to reply to you MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #49

Thanks for the 'heads up', I saw 48 and replied to you. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #51

They had to vote for Rubio MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #48

If they had all voted "no", would he have got in anyway? Think. Again. Jan 2025 #50

Yes, but their other no votes have more meaning MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #52

I see, but I believe that a strong showing of collective resistance is.... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #53

Unfortunately the way that message is reported is "Trump wins again" onenote Jan 2025 #56

Yes, I agree, I think the Dms should show a stronger resistance to everything the nazis do. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #57

It would have been Trump wins again MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #58

Exactly!, but without the "Dems cave in again" part! Think. Again. Jan 2025 #59

Democrats voting for Marco Rubio MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #60

I disagree... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #61

There is a disctinction and we have to make it MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #62

All nazis. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #63

K&R spanone Jan 2025 #30

I want to see something done about the firing of the IG's. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #31

Here's a good analysis of the situation: Ocelot II Jan 2025 #32

Thank you for sharing this. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #33

But the main question is: who's gonna stop trump when he flouts these "constraints". calimary Jan 2025 #41

That's the ultimate question, isn't it? Ocelot II Jan 2025 #44

His is the nastiest bunch of EO I have ever seen Dem4life1234 Jan 2025 #34

It's likely that this onslaught of EOs was intended just as Steve Bannon wanted - Ocelot II Jan 2025 #36

Great points Dem4life1234 Jan 2025 #39

Fuck I forgot about his veto powers! Dem4life1234 Jan 2025 #35

Thx, Ocelot. Thank you for this rational explanation. Hekate Jan 2025 #37

Problem being, of course, that the USSC has its own agenda... malthaussen Jan 2025 #38

Good to remember: calimary Jan 2025 #40

Fourteenthth amendment, shmorteenth amendment. WHERE WAS ANYONE WHEN IT WAS VIOLATED BY TRUMP? usonian Jan 2025 #43

I am in agreement... rasputin1952 Jan 2025 #54