Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We might know where all the missing Dem ballots went [View all]reACTIONary
(7,072 posts)19. Jeeze, not this shit again....
.... BallotProof was a collaborative effort by four students to help voters make sure their mail in ballots are compliment with the local rules and regulations before mailing them in. What, exactly is wrong with that?
It's a great idea, and I'm glad the four of them thought it up, implemented it, and won recognition for it.
https://devpost.com/software/ballotproof-vision
Introduction
With an emphasis on social distancing and remote engagement as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic mail-in voting surged from 24.9% to 50.3% of ballots [1] in the 2016 and 2020 primaries, respectively. This surge will also trigger an unfortunate increase in ballots rejected due to the avoidable human error; weve already started to see the effects, with half a million ballots rejected [2] in the 2020 primaries. As first-time voters, this issue is extremely critical to us as our generation seeks democratic representation. In an effort to reduce rejection rates, we introduce BallotProof, a methodology built for faster, smarter, and more secure validation of ballots.
What It Does
BallotProof is built from the ground up with ease of use and security in mind. As a result, the platform was developed with a server-independent structure, with all image analysis done on the client-side to avoid any risk of data leakage. BallotProof takes in input images of the front and back sides of your ballot and uses image analysis to specifically determine which errors can prevent your critical vote from being counted. We handle everything for you from start to finish, with automatic cropping of your pictures to showing exactly which sections in which errors were made and specific templates made for your unique ballot.
Our methods are currently able to point out if you've made any of the following:
Incorrect pen colors
Blank sections
Excessive bubble fill-ins
Improper write-in format
Ban bubble fill-ins
And much more!
And all you need to do is enter your address and take pictures of two images without fear of your data being compromised!
Devrath Iyer (Stanford '24) Ethan Shaotran (Harvard '25) Koushik Sridhar (UNC '24) Pratham Soni (Stanford '24)
With an emphasis on social distancing and remote engagement as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic mail-in voting surged from 24.9% to 50.3% of ballots [1] in the 2016 and 2020 primaries, respectively. This surge will also trigger an unfortunate increase in ballots rejected due to the avoidable human error; weve already started to see the effects, with half a million ballots rejected [2] in the 2020 primaries. As first-time voters, this issue is extremely critical to us as our generation seeks democratic representation. In an effort to reduce rejection rates, we introduce BallotProof, a methodology built for faster, smarter, and more secure validation of ballots.
What It Does
BallotProof is built from the ground up with ease of use and security in mind. As a result, the platform was developed with a server-independent structure, with all image analysis done on the client-side to avoid any risk of data leakage. BallotProof takes in input images of the front and back sides of your ballot and uses image analysis to specifically determine which errors can prevent your critical vote from being counted. We handle everything for you from start to finish, with automatic cropping of your pictures to showing exactly which sections in which errors were made and specific templates made for your unique ballot.
Our methods are currently able to point out if you've made any of the following:
Incorrect pen colors
Blank sections
Excessive bubble fill-ins
Improper write-in format
Ban bubble fill-ins
And much more!
And all you need to do is enter your address and take pictures of two images without fear of your data being compromised!
Devrath Iyer (Stanford '24) Ethan Shaotran (Harvard '25) Koushik Sridhar (UNC '24) Pratham Soni (Stanford '24)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Funny a couple days after the election it came to me that they hacked the machines
kimbutgar
Feb 2025
#4
I think that's why the🍑💩🤡 demanded that our Governor Newsom do away with mail in voting
kimbutgar
Feb 2025
#25
Democrats are too noble and proud to ever claim they had an election stolen from us. We're too smart for that.
elocs
Feb 2025
#5
So now your conspiracy theory is so ridiculous that you are accusing Harris of being complicit?
tritsofme
Feb 2025
#110
The Harris team isn't hanging on the edge of their seats waiting for Palast to release his next tranche of nonsense.
tritsofme
Feb 2025
#133
Er . . .. no - she just should have confirmed the loss or fought for her legitimate win.
colorado_ufo
Feb 2025
#130
Ok...did so did she not do that on January 6th while presiding over the certification of the election?
tritsofme
Feb 2025
#136
You could view it that way, but presiding over the certification was a requirement of her position..
colorado_ufo
Feb 2025
#137
There was no reason to ask for recounts. None of the states were close enough to warrant it.
tritsofme
Feb 2025
#138
Trump was not popular, but a polled a few points higher than he did in 2020 (low 40's vs. mid-high 40's)
Polybius
Feb 2025
#80
The software is written in the tabulation code and it doesn't need to be connected to the internet.
kimbutgar
Feb 2025
#41
We lost. Ballots were not changed. Need to accept that and move on. But many won't.
Silent Type
Feb 2025
#21
He won a plurality of votes. It happened because he was able to deceive too many voters.
totodeinhere
Feb 2025
#35
I'll listen to any proof you think you have, unless it's Greg Palast type BS. I think VP Harris would have filed law
Silent Type
Feb 2025
#37
Yes. Not one of those 3 to 4 million voters that Palast calculates ever came forward to say, "I showed
Silent Type
Feb 2025
#111
I'll accept the anecdotal 1 case. If you'll acknowledge most purges are legit. I've been purged at least 4 times
Silent Type
Feb 2025
#117
Come on people, The election was NOT stolen. All of these conspiracy theories on DU
totodeinhere
Feb 2025
#33
So encourage them keep investigating quietly until they have overwhelming evidence - if it exists.
Trust_Reality
Feb 2025
#49
We went down the "elections are fair and honest"path because we are the honest and sane side.
totodeinhere
Feb 2025
#53
Elections are not fair and honest? So if you believe that you must believe that
totodeinhere
Feb 2025
#61
Maybe we need a sub-forum for those who, no matter how much they are presented with data and logic,
yellow dahlia
Feb 2025
#96
Yes...that is exactly what the poster above proposed. A sub-forum for the Trumpy election denial conspiracy theories
tritsofme
Feb 2025
#101
Thanks. "It was a dark and stormy night..." is the first line of one of my favorite
Dark n Stormy Knight
Feb 2025
#102
Dems in Congress and we, the still-sane American people, need to act NOW to make sure the Midterm elections are not
LaMouffette
Feb 2025
#122
The vote counting IS the ONLY part of the US demnocracy, that actually is working fine!
TomWilm
Feb 2025
#141
