Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

kelly1mm

(5,756 posts)
6. Ok - I thought you were talking about an actual legal approach to the problem, rather than just
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:53 PM
Dec 2012

a rant. The problem is that the courts generally do not have different levels of scrutiny for different amendments to the constitution. Basically what I am saying is that if you were to propose that the 2nd amendment only protects the ownership of weapons that existed at the time that the amendment was ratified, the same limitations would apply to other civil rights. Thus, since the internet did not exist at the time of the 1st amendment, it should not be protected. I think everyone knows that this will be played out in the courts so legal principles matter.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When Constitution was wri...»Reply #6