Dark Enlightenment and the Techno Fascist Playbook

[JCMach1]

6. Biggest weaknesses in the techno fascist philosophy

Based on the sources, here's a summary of the most glaring weaknesses in the techno-fascist argument:

* **Undemocratic Nature * Techno-fascism advocates for replacing democratic governments with authoritarian structures like sovereign joint-stock corporations led by a "CEO-monarch". This directly contradicts the fundamental democratic principle of popular sovereignty and the right of people to choose their leaders.
* **Potential for Abuse of Power * Granting total power to an executive unencumbered by liberal-democratic procedures creates a significant risk of abuse. Without checks and balances, such a system could easily become tyrannical, suppressing dissent and violating individual rights.
* **Elitism and Inequality * Techno-fascism envisions a society where large owners or "shareholders" elect the executive, effectively disenfranchising the majority of the population. This elitist approach disregards the principle of equality and could lead to vast disparities in wealth and power.
* **Disregard for Institutions * Curtis Yarvin, a key figure associated with techno-fascism, advocates for dismantling existing institutions like universities and the media, which he refers to as "the Cathedral". Such actions would undermine the foundations of a free society, including education, independent journalism, and the ability to hold power accountable.
* **Oversimplification of Complex Problems * Techno-fascism offers simplistic solutions to complex societal problems, such as replacing government employees with technocrats. This ignores the expertise and experience of civil servants and the importance of democratic processes in addressing multifaceted challenges.
* **Historical Ignorance * Yarvin alludes to the idea that Hitler's invasions were acts of self-defense and criticizes the accepted "World War II mythology". This demonstrates a flawed understanding of history and a dangerous willingness to downplay the atrocities committed by authoritarian regimes.
* **Contradictory Stance * Yarvin supports authoritarianism on right-libertarian grounds, which is contradictory. He favors some individual freedoms while advocating for a political system that would likely suppress those same freedoms.
* **Naivety Regarding Technology * Techno-fascism assumes that technology can solve social and political problems, ignoring the potential for technology to be used for surveillance, control, and manipulation. It also fails to recognize that technology is not neutral and can reflect the biases and interests of its creators.
* **Ignoring unintended consequences**: The "Butterfly Revolution" strategy to capture, subvert, and take over a sovereign state to install a new totalitarian government ignores the chaos that emerges when trying to extract a pre-modern and cameralist order from the future.
* **Racist undertones**: Yarvin has expressed the belief that white people are genetically endowed with higher IQs than black people and has suggested race may determine whether individuals are better suited for slavery.